View Full Version : looking for a few shows -please help me !
pruehalliwell 06-28-2006, 11:19 AM i am looking for a few shows here they are
american juniors -all epsiodes
the mole season 2
jeannie (cartoon)
family affair(1990's)-all episodes
family affair(1960's)-all except first season
i am willing to send dvd's for you to use for these or maybe we can get a trade going. email me at pruehalliwell_patti@hotmail.com
thanks
pruehalliwell 06-28-2006, 11:32 AM hi there again i am looking for these shows as well but only a few epsiodes so email me and i will let you knwo what ones i am looking for
emergency
chips
highway to heaven
tj hooker
matt houston
finder of lost loves
love boat
fantasy island
touched by an angel
my email is pruehalliwell_patti@hotmail.com
Lamont 06-28-2006, 11:34 AM i am looking for a few shows here they are
jeannie (cartoon)
family affair(1990's)-all episodes
family affair(1960's)-all except first season
[/email]
thanks
have all these
Lamont 06-28-2006, 11:40 AM emergency
chips
highway to heaven
tj hooker
pruehalliwell_patti@hotmail.com
have these too
pruehalliwell 06-30-2006, 10:42 AM doesn't anyone have these?
Lamont 06-30-2006, 10:48 AM doesn't anyone have these?
many of us do, i replied and i do also,but u didnt have anything i could use in trade
sorry
keep searching:wave:
pruehalliwell 06-30-2006, 05:54 PM i guess i am having bad luck i should just forget it ! i guess i am not menat to have them
Hazel Anyday 06-30-2006, 06:11 PM You're lucky in one area, Family Affair will probably all come out over the next year or 2 commercially. Season 1's availalbe now. :D As for the other shows, it would be good if you had something in your arsenal to trade with. Trouble with the few traders here that have everything under the sun, when you want something of theirs you can't get it because they have everything already so there's nothing you can offer but a sad story. :( I have a very large collection of movies and TV shows but even with all that the few traders you'll find around here already have everything you have and a 1000 other shows you wouldn't ever want besides. :eek: So when they have everything there's nothing you can offer so you stay in the dog house a wishin' and a hopin'. :o
One thing I don't understand about this place, why tell everyone about the 1000's of shows you have if there's no way for anyone to get them because they already have everything you have. It's like putting out a great product in the window and then not allowing anyone to buy or trade for it. :mad: I have a pretty large collection too, and when I can't find anything to offer, I can imagine how it must be for the average Sam or Jane to get a trade in action who have just a couple series.
padre 06-30-2006, 06:14 PM Hazel, what are you expecting Lamont to do - trade with someone, even though they don't have anything he wants? That's nonsense.
I trade with Lamont on a regular basis, many on this board do as well, despite the fact that both he and I have thousands of shows.
Hazel Anyday 06-30-2006, 06:26 PM Well, goody goody for you. You must have the 9000th and one show he doesn't have. :p By the way, I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, this was just a comment that I'm sure many other people have asked themselves too. Why advertise you have 9000 shows when you can't do anything for anyone else who may want one or 2 of them? And no, I'm not expecting anyone here to start sending out care packages, it just must be very frustrating to the normal starting out trader to get shows from someone who has everything when they have next to nothing. There are a couple series I can think of that I wouldn't mind having, but even with my collection it's not enough to match the amount of episodes in the series I want. So I can easily imagine how this person feels.:wave:
padre 06-30-2006, 06:30 PM Oh, I don't have to imagine how they feel. We all start with little in our collection, and somehow we figure out how to make it grow. But whining about it doesn't help anyone, and even puts people off.
Hazel Anyday 06-30-2006, 06:36 PM :D Who's whining? I'm as happy as a clam, merely commenting on an insoluable problem. Does't make any sense to advertise you have just about everything when there's no way any one else can get it. Call me crazy, but that's the way I sees it.:crazy:
Lamont 06-30-2006, 07:39 PM Hazel--- if u ever read the FEEDBACK PORTION of this board- u will see that good old Lamont trades with TONS of people, i do about 10-15 trades a month, some small - some big, and i work with people to get stuff and try to be fair
now to answer a few points--- 1. YES i do have tons of stuff--- so NO i do not trade with people unless they have something that 1. i dont, 2. i want
that is just how it is
ALSO--- people CAN ALWAYS work something out if they want a set--- u cannot sell on the site-- HOWEVER there is no rule against TRADER X emailing TRADER Y directly and arranging a sale---- happens all the time
ALSO--- i often trade people stuff that many times people wouldnt think --- for instance i have been known to trade someone X # of discs for BLAH BLAH BLAH season 4 retail set---- or i even once traded for a bunch of WWE wrestling figures--- so im not unapproachable
ALSO--- there are MANY MANY ways for newer traders to get started---- as has been discussed about 10 times this month--- to recap
1. Spend some $ on an auction site to get a set that is new and in demand, and then trade the heck out of it--- FOR INSTANCE i know someone who had NOTHING last year--- they BOUGHT a set on ebay, that was new and cost a bit of $$$, then traded it to 10 people when it was hot--- and SUDDENLY they had a good trade list
2. TAPE shows that people dont have--- lots of shows are airing in local markets that noone has sets of--- and some of the common shows like BERNIE MAC, THE WAYANS BROTHERS and SISTER, SISTER and IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT, NYPD BLUE or WALKER TEXAS RANGER would be great sets to make-- NOONE has them
3. while i try to be fair and accomodate everyone, i simply cannot trade people for stuff i cannot use and dont have--- its not being a jerk, and not being high and mighty--- just common sense
NOW I KNOW u have a great trade list-- and to be honest- u have some stuff id like to snag, but it seems like u have the impression that some of us with bigger lists dont like to trade with new members- which is just not so
I do list new stuff i get in, and if someone asks, i reply if i have it--- whether the person asking has a big list like Hazel Anyday, Loren or Padre--- or just a small list--- i reply if i have it
if someone asks and wants a set i will try to make sure they get it
but sometimes, it just doesnt work out
and my message to---PrueHalliwell is, dont get discouraged--- i have only been trading about a year or so and i started off with a small list too, just be persistent and patient!
pruehalliwell 07-01-2006, 11:09 AM i have a lot more thanis on my list right now i am working on doing a new list as i got a new computer a few months ago and my list was on my old computer i am going to work on it today and next week and maybe i will put it on here who knows i may get someone yet !but i'm not going to hold my breath
KonfusionFTC 07-01-2006, 11:56 AM if u dont have anything to trade. you can always get stuff from ioffer or where ever else to get yourself started.
pruehalliwell 07-01-2006, 07:50 PM i have a few more shows to add to my list
logans run -all except 2 epsiodes
emily of new moon-about 12 epsiodes
bionic woman-about15-20 episodes
six million dollar man-about 10-15 episodes
planet of the apes-all except last 2 episodes
more to come as well
i am sorry if it seemed like i was whinning earlier
pruehalliwell 07-01-2006, 07:51 PM these are ones i found today that i have
Lamont 07-01-2006, 08:08 PM One thing I don't understand about this place, why tell everyone about the 1000's of shows you have if there's no way for anyone to get them because they already have everything you have. It's like putting out a great product in the window and then not allowing anyone to buy or trade for it. .
HEY!?!?! i just remembered----- if u feel so strongly this way, do u recall about a year ago when SOMEONE was asking $125 a piece--- for 5 missing episodes of MY THREE SONS and wouldnt trade them or swap for ANYTHING AT ALL???? $625 for 5 eps of a show????? the eps turned up later on and the set got completed, but i remember a certain NEWBIE at that time, who asked someone with a LARGE LIST to swap for those and that giving spirit was lacking then!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Lamont 07-01-2006, 08:09 PM i have a few more shows to add to my list
logans run -all except 2 epsiodes
emily of new moon-about 12 epsiodes
bionic woman-about15-20 episodes
six million dollar man-about 10-15 episodes
planet of the apes-all except last 2 episodes
more to come as well
i am sorry if it seemed like i was whinning earlier
what is EMILY OF NEW MOON about???? never heard of it
pruehalliwell 07-01-2006, 08:32 PM about a orphan on prince edward island almost like anne of green gables except she goes with family
Lamont 07-01-2006, 08:37 PM the details on how many eps, quality etc
im open to that
digitalmonkey 07-01-2006, 09:22 PM Emily of New Moon (http://www.tv.com/emily-of-new-moon/show/3248/episode_listings.html?season=0)
pruehalliwell 07-02-2006, 09:56 PM i have the first two episodes plus first 6 of third season i checked the first 2 epsidoes yestreday and they are good but i have to check the third season epsiodes
pruehalliwell 07-05-2006, 10:35 AM here is my have list it is not yet complete but i am wokring on it i will put on a more updated one in a few days
ALL OF THESE ARE TAPED OFF OF THE TV
24
5th season-all epsiodes (have other seasons on retail sets)
the 4400
3rd season (i have season 1,2 in retail set)
alias
5th season(missing 3 epsiodes) (have other seasons in retail sets)
beverly hills 90210
in process of transferring these frome tape to dvd
bewitched
in process of taping all episodes
charmed-all episodes
Full House
all of 3rd-8th season (have other seasons on retail sets)
ghost whisperer
all episodes
joe millionaire(reality show)
all episodes-1st and 2nd season
looking for love:bacelorettesin alaska(reality show)
all episodes
lost(reality show)
all epsisodes
murder in small town x(reality show)
all episodes
my fair brady
1st season-all episodes
2nd season-in process (currently playing )
sabrina the teenage witch
all except
the big sleep
no place like home
episode lxxxi the phantom menace
skating with celebrities
all episodes
survivor(reality show)
all except
seasons 1,2, and all stars(i have these in retail sets)
MOVIES
escape to witch mountain(wonderful world of disney)(1995)
homeward bound:the incredible journey(1993)
oliver and company(animated)(disney channel)
pocahontas 2:journey to a new world(disney channel)
toy story and toy story 2(animated)(disney channel)
up close and personel(michelle pfiefer)(encore channel)
zenon 1.2.and 3 (live action)(disney channel)
DOCUMENTARIES
AMERICAN HISTORY
abraham lincoln:perserving the union(2 hr)
american revoultion(6 hr)
benedict arnold:triumph and treason
benjarmin franklin(2 hr)
conspiracy:lincoln assination
duel:hamilton vs.burr(1 1/2 hr)(history channel)
FDR:the presidency revealed(4 hr)
first invasion:war of 1812(2 hr)
founding brothers(4 hr)
george washington:founding father
investigating history:lincoln: man or myth?
john and abigail adams:love and liberty
the lincoln assination(2hr)
lincoln(3hr)
patrick henry:voice of liberty
paul revere:the midnight rider
the presidents(8 hr)
save our history:declaration of independence
save our history:george washington's workshop
save our history:the president slept here
save our history:star spangled banner
save our history:white house:200 years
spanish american war(2 hr)
tech effect:washington crossing the delware
thomas jefferson:philospher of freedom
TR:an american lion(4 hr)
washington the warrior
AMERICAN TRAVEL
$40 a day:grand canyon(food network)
$40 a day:mount rushmore
$40 a day-philadephia(food network)
$40 a daya;washington d.c-
disney's animal kingdom(travel channel)
disney's cruise line(travel channel)
disney's fairytale weddings
disney's great escapes
disneyland:behind the scenes(travel channel)
fan's guide:walt disney world(travel channel)
grand canyon:natures great escape(travel channel)
great hotels:disney's animal kingdom lodge
great hotel's:disney's grand californian hotel
great hotels:disney's grand floridion resrt and spa
great hotels:disney's yacht and beach club resorts
great hotel's:disney's wilderness lodge
great hotls:williamsburg inn
haunted new england-
hidden yellowstone(travel channel)
hidden yosemite(travel channel)
holidays at walt disney world
making of jurassic park:the ride
modern marvels:walt disney world
mount vernon:home of george washington
secrest of denali national park(travel channel)
seaworld revealed
secrets:backstage at universal studios orlando
secrets of hershey pa.
secrets of philadelphia pa.
theme park secrets:the wild wild west
travel america: mount rushmore,crazy horse,and the black hills
travel america: rocky mountains national park
travel america: virginia's civil war parks
travel america: washington d.c
undiscovered walt disney world
unwrapped:walt disney world
vacation challenge:disney world
virginia's great plantations
virginia plantations
walt disney world:behind the scenes(travel channel)
walt disney world holidays
washington d.c:an inspiring tour
washington monuments
where history lives:a tour of the white house
world's best:family vacation in orlando
DIY SPECIALS
birdwatching-4 episodes will get episode 1 in july
cake baking and decorating-all 5 epsiodes
create your baby nursery-all 5 episodes
diy halloween-all 5 episodes
fire up the grill-all 5 episodes
growing roses-all 5 episodes
handmade gifts-all 5 episodes
holiday workshop-all 5 episodes
making home movies-all 13 episodes
spruce it up with the quenn of clean :inside the castle-all 5 episodes
spruce it up with the queen of clean :outside the castle-all 5 epsiodes
weathering the storm-all 5 episodes
the whole picture-all 13 episodes
your home make it safe-all 5 episodes
EGYPT
ancient almanac:guard of the ages:the great sphinx
the greatest pharoahs(4 hrs)
extreme explorer:return of the mummy
international profile:rameses the great(history channel international)
history explorer:egypt according to cleopatra
the real scorpion king(2 hr.)
tutankhamun:curse of the boy king
EUROPE
haunted london
inside disneyland paris
inside walt disney studios paris
passport to europe:amsterdam netherlands
passport to europe:bavaria germany
passport to europe:berlin germany
passport to europe:classic london
passport to europe:edinburgh scotland
passport to europe:london now
passport to europe:munich germany
passport to europe:salzburg,austria
Hazel Anyday 07-05-2006, 04:17 PM Why do people keep putting words in my mouth I never said. It's happened twice in this thread so far. I never said you don't want to trade with people, I merely said the results of someone advertising they have all kinds of shows and then when someone wants them but doesn't also have a 1000 shows it's impossible for them to get them, because they haven't anything to trade. Get it? Simple, huh. So my point was and still is, what's the point in informing people of the 100's of shows one may have if you can't use anything from anybody else when they want something from you. Simply put, if you already have everything, how in the world is anyone else supposed to get something from you in trade. Now you say you do lots of trades every month, I don't see how since you have everything you want already. If you're doing sales, that's another story, but as far as trading is concerned, like the old saying for those that have everything, what do you give to someone who has everything already?
Hazel Anyday 07-05-2006, 04:26 PM I do recall someone who kept constantly changing their mind on what it was they wanted and literally took months to respond to any answer I gave. Finally I figured the person was a nut and didn't bother with them anymore.
Lamont 07-05-2006, 05:16 PM I do recall someone who kept constantly changing their mind on what it was they wanted and literally took months to respond to any answer I gave. Finally I figured the person was a nut and didn't bother with them anymore.
i dont want to get into a peeing contest here
but the way i recall the story is this
"SOMEONE" posted in the MY THREE SONS Board about having the complete set last year and a newbie emailed and wanted to trade for 5 eps of the show--- the 5 that were missing last year-- and the "PERSON WITH A BIG LIST-- WHO POSTED HAVING THE SHOW" wouldnt trade for it, and only wanted to sell and then wanted a crazy $125 AN EPISODES--- yes $125 X 5 for $625 for 5 episodes
I DONT WANT TO NAME NAMES HERE, but i think it was NUTS to post having a show to trade and then not trading for it, and wanting to sell 1 disc worth of eps for over $600
and YES i do TONS OF TRADES all the time--- in fact when u sent me your list, there was stuff i wanted to trade with you, however everything i wanted wasnt transfered yet so i had to pass
im not putting words in your mouth, just responding to them--- and since we have both made our points clear, why dont we stop this back and forth on Someone elses post? as it only distracts from what they wanted to put out there, and it is really unfair to them :wave:
Hazel Anyday 07-05-2006, 05:30 PM I wasn't the one making this personal, it was you who addressed me, I even told someone else here who put words in my mouth that I wasn't specifically just talking about you, but anyone who says they have a 1000 shows but then can't trade for them becuase they already have everything. Once again, my simple little point is turned into something very ugly but by our own lovable little Lamont this time. Could it be you're feeling a bit guilty over something to take generalized comments so personally? As for your selective memory, I recall you first asking for the entire series, when I responded reasonalby I got no response. Then months later you asked for certain seasons, once again I responded reasonably and I got no answer. Then months later you came back & asked for only certain episodes, but those certain episodes just happened to be the 5 episodes it took me months and big bucks to find. My, what a coincidence. At this point I had grown weary of your less than honest tactics and asked for the moon for what you finally admitted to what you wanted.:) Yes, a selective memory is quite wonderful. Now please, I beg you, let's not take away any valuable space from the good people here who are trying to make a deal. It's so nice to be kind and considerate of others when you've gotten the last word isn't it?;)
Lamont 07-05-2006, 06:25 PM well i could go on and on
but the fact is
apparently--- you and i have Very different recollections on the matter
so i will leave it at that
no more-- he said, he said
b/c its not worth arguing over
and yes, it DID seem to everyone who read it like u were directing the words at me, and its not just my misunderstanding, if u read the replies and if u had my inbox u would see that EVERYONE took it that way
as for trading--- i DO tons of trades with people, check the feedback section, u will see how many people i swap with at any time
im sorry u feel that way, but sometimes the only resolution is to agree to disagree:wave:
pruehalliwell 07-05-2006, 08:34 PM please stop it i am trying to get some stuff here
Hazel Anyday 07-06-2006, 09:34 AM By all means, get your stuff. And to Lamont, I honestly was not directing my original question or comment at you, but at everyone here who has a large collection and advertises such and then must enounter people with shows they can't use because they already have them. Such a simple point and it caused so much hub-bub. But back to the dickering now for Prune.
lilhave 07-06-2006, 11:02 AM By all means, get your stuff. And to Lamont, I honestly was not directing my original question or comment at you, but at everyone here who has a large collection and advertises such and then must enounter people with shows they can't use because they already have them. Such a simple point and it caused so much hub-bub. But back to the dickering now for Prune.
The problem really arises when one trader looks at another's list and notices that person is lacking a program that they possess. The assumption now bceomes "If they don't have it, they want it". Hasty generaliztion, maybe yes and maybe no. But some become quite adamant in their demands. " I want what you got, and you don't have this, so let's trade" Sure, some sellers will trade for most anything to replenish their stock and make for larger inventory but the collector thinks different. "Do I want It" becomes the prevaling thought. If not no trade.
Nothing wrong it posting your library, it's part of the trading process. But trading like any legal contract must have offer and acceptance. Not one saying "I want, so take from me"
Harvey
Hazel Anyday 07-06-2006, 11:19 AM I've gotten lists from other people telling me they want a program from me and that all I need to do is pick something from them. Well, trouble is I may not want any of the shows on their list, long or short. I really only collect shows I like, not everything under the sun, and most of my likes are of shows from the past. So when I get a list from someone that contains all shows from the 1980's or '90's to the present, I could care less. There does have to be a satisfaction on both parties for a successful trade. But the more shows you have must make it tougher and tougher to do a trade with someone, because you wind up having everything you want already. That was all I was trying to say from the beginning. Now, in my case I have a fairly big collection, but, by no means as big as many of the people here because I only want shows that I actually like and will watch. I don't want shows just to have them, but to watch and those I watch are all old and that's what I like.
lilhave 07-06-2006, 11:52 AM I've gotten lists from other people telling me they want a program from me and that all I need to do is pick something from them. Well, trouble is I may not want any of the shows on their list, long or short. I really only collect shows I like, not everything under the sun, and most of my likes are of shows from the past. So when I get a list from someone that contains all shows from the 1980's or '90's to the present, I could care less. There does have to be a satisfaction on both parties for a successful trade. But the more shows you have must make it tougher and tougher to do a trade with someone, because you wind up having everything you want already. That was all I was trying to say from the beginning. Now, in my case I have a fairly big collection, but, by no means as big as many of the people here because I only want shows that I actually like and will watch. I don't want shows just to have them, but to watch and those I watch are all old and that's what I like.
Same here. 90 percent of my collection is from the 50's and 60's
Harvey
GoldenGirlsFan92 07-06-2006, 12:30 PM Does anybody have Empty Nest?
pruehalliwell 07-06-2006, 12:58 PM everyone just forget it ! i wansted people to respond only about trading with me and i have got nothing probably because of all the compalining ! if you want to trade with me please send me a priviate message or emaiil me at preuhalliwell_patti@htomail.com i will not be checking this post anymore if all i see is complaining that was not my intent and i did not take it that any thing said was towards me again if you want to trade or see my updated list please email me at the above address
pruehalliwell 07-06-2006, 12:59 PM preuhalliwell_patti@hotmail.com
the email in the last one is wrong
digitalmonkey 07-06-2006, 01:27 PM everyone just forget it ! i wansted people to respond only about trading with me and i have got nothing probably because of all the compalining ! if you want to trade with me please send me a priviate message or emaiil me at preuhalliwell_patti@htomail.com i will not be checking this post anymore if all i see is complaining that was not my intent and i did not take it that any thing said was towards me again if you want to trade or see my updated list please email me at the above address
I'm thinking your whining may be more detrimental than any bickering going on in here. Potential traders can/will just skip over the bickering.
jasimon1 07-06-2006, 01:39 PM I'm thinking your whining may be more detrimental than any bickering going on in here. Potential traders can/will just skip over the bickering.
I don't think she is whining at all. Hazel is the one that was whining and hijacked the thread. If I were you, I'd just start a new thread pruehalliwell.
digitalmonkey 07-06-2006, 01:56 PM i guess i am having bad luck i should just forget it ! i guess i am not menat to have them
who knows i may get someone yet !but i'm not going to hold my breath
please stop it i am trying to get some stuff here
everyone just forget it !
I'm not attacking pruehalliwell, I'm just saying that she/he sounds like someone who is either very immature or complaining; not something a lot of traders necessarily want to deal with. Again I'm not attacking as I don't even know pruehalliwell, but that's just the impression I get and maybe it's the impression someone else gets too.
lilhave 07-06-2006, 03:01 PM I'm not attacking pruehalliwell, I'm just saying that she/he sounds like someone who is either very immature or complaining; not something a lot of traders necessarily want to deal with. Again I'm not attacking as I don't even know pruehalliwell, but that's just the impression I get and maybe it's the impression someone else gets too.
Give you my take on this.
Pruehalliwelll bgan by posting two or threads minutes apart giving his wants. Lamont repsonded moments later by saying" I have same" Pruehalliwell now responded moments later with "doesn't anyone want to trade", and more then once. Sounds like begging to me. We have one trader here always looking for one original airing of this or that and never or rarely gets a response but he keeps coming back but not minutes later.
Hazel then decided to jump in and again my opinion was pointing to Lamont with his barbs about big collections and trading techniques.
So to sum up, Pruehalliwell began by being repetitous in his quest, which can be interpeted as whinning and Hazel changed the thought of the thread with his own agenda.
Harvey
Hazel Anyday 07-06-2006, 05:22 PM Once again, for the one zillionth time, I DID NOT DIRECT MY COMMENTS AT LAMONT!!! It was directed at EVERYONE, YOU, ME, all God's Chil'en with giant collections. Holy Cow, how many times do you people have to keep telling me "what I really meant" when I never meant it at all toward Lamont BUT EVERYONE with a big collection. :mad: And I've seen plenty of people on this board advertising their giant collections, the L man is only one of at least a dozen people here doing it. So PLEASE stop saying I meant it toward just one person, he wasn't even on my mind at the time, ALL of YOU were. GET IT? Or are you once again going to tell me what I was thinking, never mind that I know what I'm thinking and all of you are wrong who think you know better about what I meant than I do. :mad:
And to the one sad confused individual who can't recognize a whine from an astute and brilliant comment. Since when is it "whining" to merely make a distinguished observation. It is not a whine it is a comment, big difference. If I chose to whine I can think of other subjects worthy of whining about, like being constantly mis-interpreted and having words put in my mouth I never said or meant. Now that's a whine worthy topic. Class dismissed.:eek:
lilhave 07-06-2006, 05:45 PM And to the one sad confused individual who can't recognize a whine from an astute and brilliant comment. Since when is it "whining" to merely make a distinguished observation.
So glad we have Plato in our midst. To me it's a honor to sit at your feet and observe all of life's happening's from such a learned man.
Hope everyone else appreciates your teachings as much as I do.
Harvey
Hazel Anyday 07-06-2006, 05:45 PM OK, I've calmed down now. The old boiler blew on that last one. :eek: I forgot to say to Prune, that my original comment was a sympathetic one directed toward her/him(Prune) and those like Prune who are starting out. But now after witnessing Prune's temper tantrum and stomping out of the room to go sulk in a corner, I'm afraid he/she wasn't worthy of the empathy I had for him/her.:lol: As they say, no good deed goes unpunished and poor Prune couldn't even appreciate a kindly comment meant sypathetically toward him/her. Instead I get the door slammed in my face after nodding in sympathy with it. Come back Prune, all is forgiven.:lol:
Lamont 07-06-2006, 06:58 PM the problem is that 1. i posted a reply and 2. u followed it up with your comment directed at "people with big lists who dont want to trade for somethings" so the natural inference was that it was intended toward me
---- and when i replied that i trade with tons of people and to check the feedback portion, u commented that u didnt see how i could still be trading and commented that "maybe if you are selling...." and so on, so what do people assume?
also--- 3. i replied to you last month or 2 about possible trades-- however everything i wanted that you listed as having was "not yet transfered" so that is why it fell through, i was willing-- u were not able
and 4. i stayed quiet all day on this one, b/c pru... asked the comments to stop, but since u have posted several more times i wanted to clarify
noone was jumping on you, and despite what your intentions might have been, everyone who read it got the exact same impression, that you were commenting on me
and your follow ups seemed to drive the point home
if u want to continue this line of comments, please start a new thread and let this one go, its a shame, b/c the person who posted it is rightfully frustrated at seeing it hijacked like this
:wave:
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 09:44 AM :confused: All I can do is shake my head ruefully. Here I am the author of my tiny little comment, and I, the author have stated time and time again I was not referring to one particular collector, but ALL OF US with large collections who show them here to others. I know this may be hard to believe for some of you, but my every waking thought does not involve your apparent hero Lamont. And even more unbelievable my every simple statement is not directed at or meant to be about this same individual. Now even this individual apparently must think the world revolves around him and all statements or thoughts are of him, because no matter how many time I repeat and repeat I never ever ever ever ever meant my sweet innocent comment to be about this same individual the siccophants of this individual and even the individual himself still after all these clarifications STILL thinks I was talking about him. Now I ask you, how swell headed do you really have to be? My world does not revolve around this individual and though you people out there may think the world starts and stops around this person, I don't, I actually will go for hours on end without thinking about this person. Can you believe it? OK, I've had it, I'll say it one last time, my comment was made about ALL OF US, me included, with big collections who must deal with people with smaller or no collections. So innocent a comment, so brief, so simple, so innocuous, yet the siccophants and the individual himself insists on putting himself as the center of the universe and worse of my comment. IT WAS NOT MEANT TO BE JUST ABOUT ONE MERE MORTAL BUT ALL OF US, please try to imagine a world that does not revolve around this one person and maybe you can conceive of my comment for what it was. A simple plaintive slight empathatic notion of what smaller collectors must go thru. Now weather you people can believe it or whether the swell headed one can believe it, my comment was about all of US NOT one of us. SHEESH! Just unbelievable.
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 09:55 AM Seriously, if you weren't obsessing about Lamonts comments, this wouldn't have gotten so out of hand. You're the one who is perpetuating (see, I can use big words too) this thing. When you called me a sad confused individual, I didn't say anything because frankly, I don't care about you. You mean nothing to me and your words even less. The only reason a person would keep responding over and over to something they say they don't care about is because they do.
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 09:56 AM :confused: All I can do is shake my head ruefully. Here I am the author of my tiny little comment, and I, the author have stated time and time again I was not referring to one particular collector, but ALL OF US with large collections who show them here to others. I know this may be hard to believe for some of you, but my every waking thought does not involve your apparent hero Lamont. And even more unbelievable my every simple statement is not directed at or meant to be about this same individual. Now even this individual apparently must think the world revolves around him and all statements or thoughts are of him, because no matter how many time I repeat and repeat I never ever ever ever ever meant my sweet innocent comment to be about this same individual the siccophants of this individual and even the individual himself still after all these clarifications STILL thinks I was talking about him. Now I ask you, how swell headed do you really have to be? My world does not revolve around this individual and though you people out there may think the world starts and stops around this person, I don't, I actually will go for hours on end without thinking about this person. Can you believe it? OK, I've had it, I'll say it one last time, my comment was made about ALL OF US, me included, with big collections who must deal with people with smaller or no collections. So innocent a comment, so brief, so simple, so innocuous, yet the siccophants and the individual himself insists on putting himself as the center of the universe and worse of my comment. IT WAS NOT MEANT TO BE JUST ABOUT ONE MERE MORTAL BUT ALL OF US, please try to imagine a world that does not revolve around this one person and maybe you can conceive of my comment for what it was. A simple plaintive slight empathatic notion of what smaller collectors must go thru. Now weather you people can believe it or whether the swell headed one can believe it, my comment was about all of US NOT one of us. SHEESH! Just unbelievable.
Wow...why is it so hard for you to comprehend that your comments appeared to be directed at one individual? Sure, let's say for arguments sake that it was a general statement made to include all members with large collections; that still doesn't preclude it from being misinterpreted or responded to by individuals. If I call all redheads ugly should my generalization prevent any single redheaded person from taking it personally?
I don't know you. I don't know Lamont. You questioned why those with large collections even bother posting what they have when they rarely find anything to trade for and Lamont responded.
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 10:09 AM And while I care not a whit about you also Jas, I do care about what I say and I do care if I'm being constantly misconstrued and misinterpreted. The only reason I ever was forced, and I repeat forced to mention this one person's name was because I was RESPONDING to false charges that were linking my innocent comment meant about everyone to just one person. If it had been up to me this person's name would never even have come up. But it's all of you who keep telling me what I think and what I said as if you know more about what I think than I do that I am constantly forced to have to deny your false claims. Case closed, if you'll stop telling me what I think then I can stop telling that you haven't a clue as to what I think.
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 10:17 AM And while I care not a whit about you also Jas, I do care about what I say and I do care if I'm being constantly misconstrued and misinterpreted. The only reason I ever was forced, and I repeat forced to mention this one person's name was because I was RESPONDING to false charges that were linking my innocent comment meant about everyone to just one person. If it had been up to me this person's name would never even have come up. But it's all of you who keep telling me what I think and what I said as if you know more about what I think than I do that I am constantly forced to have to deny your false claims. Case closed, if you'll stop telling me what I think then I can stop telling that you haven't a clue as to what I think.
My point has nothing to do with what you originally said. My point is that any person who truely doesn't care wouldn't keep reacting and wouldn't care if we were putting words in your mouth. If you don't care, ignore it and move on. Why do you care if you're being misconstrued and misinterpreted by people you obviously feel are way bellow your mental capacity?
Lamont 07-07-2006, 10:22 AM again i sat by to see if it would peter out on its own
a few words
HAZEL ANYDAY u have been asked over and over to PLEASE stop going on and on about this, the original poster asked u to drop, i asked u to start a new thread if u wanted to keep it going--- but yet you go on and on and on and on---- and to be honest, that is what is causing people to turn against you on this thread-- b/c u will not let it go, no matter how many times u r nicely asked and it seems as if u r getting angry with what others are replying
SECONDLY--- no matter what your "intentions" may have been, i think its 100% safe to say that EVERYONE who read this thread, assumed u were directing it towards me--- b/c that is what EVERYONE has posted, and when i replied to you as such you addressed your comments DIRECTLY to me when u posted this--
Now you say you do lots of trades every month, I don't see how since you have everything you want already. If you're doing sales, that's another story
also when PADRE spoke up for me and commented that he trades with me often
YOU AGAIN REPLIED WITH COMMENTS TOWARDS ME i quote---
Well, goody goody for you. You must have the 9000th and one show he doesn't have.
THIRD-- i do not appreciate being insulted and called SWELL HEADED b/c i and everyone else on the entire board, read and understood what you meant! no matter what your ORIGINAL intent might have been, your follow ups SURE ZOOMED IN ON ONE PERSON ALONE!
both those comments were RIGHT TO LAMONT-- so please dont pretend that none of us can read! and getting into other scrapes with others for disagreeing with you, only serves to make ONE PERSON look bad.... and that one person sure aint me
so when u keep posting TOWARDS ME PERSONALLY and ABOUT ME PERSONALLY how can u claim its not meant towards me??????
come on man, get over it and move on, u made some comments that were not well received---- its no big deal, can we stop this endless back and forth now????
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 10:43 AM :) How many ways can you say the same thing over and over. Well, I refuse to say the same thing over and over. Even if this same swell headed individual insists on putting himself in my generalized comment I will once again repeat, very calmly, I never ever meant my statement about one person. Clear? Simple? Understandable? Now, try to imagine a world that doesn't revolve around one person and you can then read my comment for what it was and you can then stop inserting one individual inside my comment and stop accusing me of talking about that one person. You see, how it goes, I am once again FORCED to talk about this person because even the person himself still refuses to believe a comment can be made that does not refer to him. I am RESPONDING TO YOUR FALSE CLAIMS AGAIN. Therefore I am forced to keep talking about someone I have no interest in talking about. I only wish I would never have to tell you the same message again. But the thick heads who refuse to believe there can be a world that doesn't revolve around one person won't let me walk away. And as long as you keep making your false charges, I promise you I'll be back to deny them every single time.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 10:46 AM Seriously, if you weren't obsessing about Lamonts comments, this wouldn't have gotten so out of hand. You're the one who is perpetuating (see, I can use big words too) this thing. When you called me a sad confused individual, I didn't say anything because frankly, I don't care about you. You mean nothing to me and your words even less. The only reason a person would keep responding over and over to something they say they don't care about is because they do.
Even thou I'm wild about Jas, I made a vow not to ask her out till she started using big words. Now that she has, I was wondering if you were available for dinner tonight.?
Harvey
P.S. You have anything slinky?
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 10:54 AM Even thou I'm wild about Jas, I made a vow not to ask her out till she started using big words. Now that she has, I was wondering if you were available for dinner tonight.?
Harvey
P.S. You have anything slinky?
I'm fighting a nasty sinus cold right now and i've got wrestling tickets for tomorrow so tonight is probably not a good idea. You know, I'm close enough to were savage lives that if you came out here, you could see us both ;)
lilhave 07-07-2006, 11:16 AM I'm fighting a nasty sinus cold right now and i've got wrestling tickets for tomorrow so tonight is probably not a good idea. You know, I'm close enough to were savage lives that if you came out here, you could see us both ;)
Oh Boy, a three way.
P.S. Lamont just sent me a bunch of disks of wrestling shoot interviews of some of the past stars, speaking out of character and discussing the inner workings of the game. Looking forward to seeing that. As a kid wrestling was on in N.Y.C. every night of the week from a differnt part of the country. In those days it was territories. Sunday was from California and Jules Strongbow, Florida and Gordon Solie was wednesday. Friday was fom New Jersey, Thursday, the WWWF televised from Capital Arena in Washington. Can vividly remeber the big feud with Antonio Rocca and Karl Von Hess. My favorite was saturday night from Chicago, the Amphi theater and Jack Brickhouse announcing, Featuring Killer Kowalski, Yukon Eric, Farmer Grey, the Mighty Atlas, Art Neilson, Reggie Lisowski and Benito Gardenia. Lots of fun and was allowed to stay up late. Before getting married I took my wife to be, one saturday night to Madison square garden to see my favorite all time wrestler, the original Shiek in a championship bout against Bruno. Of course Bruno won but the Shiek was the best at getting the crowd riled up. Pointed boots, fire thumb, fork in his belt, and that Camel trot was priceless.
Anyway enjoy the card. What is it, WWE.?
Harvey
Did you know that many years ago Lamont wrestled? Very successful. He called himself "the Fabulous Moolah"
pruehalliwell 07-07-2006, 11:20 AM as for asking about trades i was not begging i was just trying to keep this thread from getting lost on page five or whatever i ma sorry if it seemed like i was begging
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 11:22 AM Did you know that many years ago Lamont wrestled? Very successful. He called himself "the Fabulous Moolah"
I heard he would never actually trad...er, fight anyone though. :D
lilhave 07-07-2006, 11:24 AM I heard he would never actually trad...er, fight anyone though. :D
Some states banned him. His tag team partner was a sheep.
Harvey
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 11:32 AM Wrestling is my shameful little obsession right now. Everyone I know thinks I'm crazy for liking it. If you think of it as a soap opera where people get hurt though it's quite fasinating. It is kinda sad that as a 25 yr old girl I know most of the wrestlers you were talking about. My boyfriend has been into it since birth and got me into it. I love going to the WWE shows but my favorite is Windy City Pro Wrestling, mainly because it's like a family, we know all the wrestlers and all the regular fans. Tomorrow is ECW in Racine. If only my #2 boyfriend (Matt Hardy) had left WWE to go to ECW, it would have been wonderful. Don't worry Harvey, you're boyfriend #4 now.
pruehalliwell 07-07-2006, 11:35 AM if anyone is intrested i just put my updated trade list on a new thread
Lamont 07-07-2006, 11:49 AM :) How many ways can you say the same thing over and over. Well, I refuse to say the same thing over and over. Even if this same swell headed individual insists on putting himself in my generalized comment I will once again repeat, very calmly, I never ever meant my statement about one person. Clear? Simple? Understandable? Now, try to imagine a world that doesn't revolve around one person and you can then read my comment for what it was and you can then stop inserting one individual inside my comment and stop accusing me of talking about that one person. You see, how it goes, I am once again FORCED to talk about this person because even the person himself still refuses to believe a comment can be made that does not refer to him. I am RESPONDING TO YOUR FALSE CLAIMS AGAIN. Therefore I am forced to keep talking about someone I have no interest in talking about. I only wish I would never have to tell you the same message again. But the thick heads who refuse to believe there can be a world that doesn't revolve around one person won't let me walk away. And as long as you keep making your false charges, I promise you I'll be back to deny them every single time.
OK i love how u FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE SPECIFICS! get real!
once again
you addressed your comments DIRECTLY to me when u posted this--
Now you say you do lots of trades every month, I don't see how since you have everything you want already. If you're doing sales, that's another story
also when PADRE spoke up for me and commented that he trades with me often
YOU AGAIN REPLIED WITH COMMENTS TOWARDS ME i quote---
Well, goody goody for you. You must have the 9000th and one show he doesn't have.
that is what YOU wrote NOT me, and it was in DIRECT REPLY TO ME and to PADRE commenting on me!!! So please, for the love of god, explain HOW THOSE 2 COMMENTS ABOUT ME and DIRECTLY IN REPLY TO ME--- how those 2 comments are NOT ABOUT ME????
i just let it roll off of me, but by DENYING YOUR OWN WORDS, which are CLEARLY spelled out, u r being silly!
lilhave 07-07-2006, 11:53 AM Wrestling is my shameful little obsession right now. Everyone I know thinks I'm crazy for liking it. If you think of it as a soap opera where people get hurt though it's quite fasinating. It is kinda sad that as a 25 yr old girl I know most of the wrestlers you were talking about. My boyfriend has been into it since birth and got me into it. I love going to the WWE shows but my favorite is Windy City Pro Wrestling, mainly because it's like a family, we know all the wrestlers and all the regular fans. Tomorrow is ECW in Racine. If only my #2 boyfriend (Matt Hardy) had left WWE to go to ECW, it would have been wonderful. Don't worry Harvey, you're boyfriend #4 now.
Yea. but boyfriend #3 is Cactus Jack.
When I grew up, folks still thought wrestling was real, and boy did the fans go wild. Some of the "heels" really knew how to drive the fans nuts. WW2 was recently over and we were experiencing the "cold war" with the Russians, so many of the early villains were Karl Von Hess, Hans Schmidt, Hans Herman, Baron Von Rascke, Mr. Moto, Toro Tanaka, Mr. Fuji, Kolo Kwaraini, Ivan Koloff, etc. Before it became politically incorrect each territory had a Indian wrestler, who would do a war chant before pinning his opponent. Chief Don Eagle, Chief Jay Strongbow, and Whaoo McDaniel. Then of course to capitalize on the Iran crisis, along came the Iron Shiek and Sgt. Slaughter, who began his career as a bad guy but would now save America. Dressed in Military garb and of course saluted the flag. Never spent a day in the service.
Enjoy the wrestling and maybe I can show Savage a few wrestling holds I know. I know I can wrestle Savage in a "falls count anywhere match" My only stipulation is that I want it to be a 30 fall match.
Harvey
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 12:03 PM Nope, sorry, bf #3 is a windy city wrestler with lots of Tattoos. I go for the bad boys, why do you think you're number 4? :) Sgt. Slaughter has been around a lot lately and Tatanka is having a match tonight I believe. My "real" boyfriend is native alaskan so he loves all the old native wrestlers. No matter what anyone says, even if the matches are scripted, the pain they endure is real and that's what facinates me most.
P.S.- My "real" boyfriend has learned not to let me watch too many wrestling dvds in a single sitting, that's when I start breaking out my wrestling holds. It's really hard for him to break out of them when he's laughing at me :)
Lamont 07-07-2006, 12:06 PM we have a lot of old legends type shows and u can often see
ivan koloff, tully blanchard, kamala, terry funk, dusty rhodes, jj dillion, the rock and roll express, the midnight express and more making appearances---- of course they have slowed wayyyy down and its not magic like it used to be
but still good to see the old guys still doing it!
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 12:21 PM You see, dear Lamont, I am now talking about and to you because you are forcing me to talk about and to you. It is not my desire or choice to talk about you here now or ever before. The only reason I am now talking about you to you is that you are forcing me to RESPOND TO COMMENTS you made. And that is PRECISELY THE REASON I had to mention those things you brought up in your question to me. I was forced to talk about you and say those things you quoted above because OTHERS brought you up and accused me of talking about you. How was I supposed to respond to someone who accuses you of saying something about something if you can't mention the something they're talking about. If I accused you of talking to Santa Claus every night before you went beddy bye, how could you respond to that without saying the words Santa Claus? You see, when someone else brings up a word and accuses you of talking about that word that you never ever mentioned or meant, then you must use that word when RESPONDING to their accusations. So I had to refer to you as you quoted because I was RESPONDING to others who brought you into the subject that I mentioned that had absolutely nothing to do with you as an individual at all. You see? There's really nothing evil going on here. I made a simple little innocent statement and then YOU and your loyal followers all accused me of talking about you. When I RESPONDED to the accusation I naturally did have to then talk about you whether I liked it or not. Hence there's your answer to you many questions you had for me. You see, I was RESPONDING to others, therefore I was forced to use your name in my RESPONSE to others & yourself who brought YOU into the equation you never had any part of to begin with. Just as I am now forced to talk about you because I am again RESPONDING to you about you. Now you could come back and say, "Hey, you just talked about me. How can you deny it?" Well, you see, the only reason I am now talking about you is that I am RESPONDING to you about you. You see, in case you're really as thick headed as you seem to act, the key word to take away with you from my message is RESPOND. That's why I am now talking about you and that's why I was forced to mention you before when I had to, now say it with me, RESPOND, to you and the others.
Now, I've been very calm and I hope I have clarified the situation. I really have nothing against you and I never have, I only have strong objections to being accused of saying things I never said or meant. And if you object to being accused of having a swelled head then I suggest you ponder the following, What do you call a person who insists your every innocent statement is all about them? Might you think they have a bit of an ego problem? If everything you said I came on and said, "stop talking about me" you might think I was a bit of a nut too. Well, now, let's all be friends and stop accusing others of saying things they never said or meant. Or at least if you do have to accuse someone to at least take their word for it when they tell you directly they never said or meant what you accuse them of. So the answer to your questions is that I was RESPONDING to others and yourself who brought you into the conversation, I never brought you into it, you and your followers did. Therefore I was forced to mention your name.
Now, sweet innocent Lamont, let's ask another question, Just who was it that made this whole thing personal by bringing up private past trade matters? Who oh who could that have been? You see, I believe a private trade especially one that never came to fruition should remain a private affair, not used to intimidate and threaten someone else from speaking out. I have nothing to be afraid of from you or anyone here because I always act honorably and honestly. So I fear no man. But since you like to broadcast the dirty linen, how can I expect you to see this point any more than you could conceive of a statment being made that DID NOT have anything to do with you, oh swelled headed center of the universe.;) You might have gotten the feeling that you're now talking to someone who won't back down and crawl off, you're right.
Peanutbutter 07-07-2006, 12:34 PM Mom!
Dad!
Can't you stop the fighting!
You're tearing me apart!!!
I've seen folks on other boards get suspended for a few days for this same thing.
Bickering back and forth.
I'd hate that to happen here.
Just throwing my $.02, but since the original poster started a new thread, this one should be closed and taken to PMs.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 12:35 PM You see, dear Lamont, I am now talking about and to you because you are forcing me to talk about and to you. It is not my desire or choice to talk about you here now or ever before. The only reason I am now talking about you to you is that you are forcing me to RESPOND TO COMMENTS you made. And that is PRECISELY THE REASON I had to mention those things you brought up in your question to me. I was forced to talk about you and say those things you quoted above because OTHERS brought you up and accused me of talking about you. How was I supposed to respond to someone who accuses you of saying something about something if you can't mention the something they're talking about. If I accused you of talking to Santa Claus every night before you went beddy bye, how could you respond to that without saying the words Santa Claus? You see, when someone else brings up a word and accuses you of talking about that word that you never ever mentioned or meant, then you must use that word when RESPONDING to their accusations. So I had to refer to you as you quoted because I was RESPONDING to others who brought you into the subject that I mentioned that had absolutely nothing to do with you as an individual at all. You see? There's really nothing evil going on here. I made a simple little innocent statement and then YOU and your loyal followers all accused me of talking about you. When I RESPONDED to the accusation I naturally did have to then talk about you whether I liked it or not. Hence there's your answer to you many questions you had for me. You see, I was RESPONDING to others, therefore I was forced to use your name in my RESPONSE to others & yourself who brought YOU into the equation you never had any part of to begin with. Just as I am now forced to talk about you because I am again RESPONDING to you about you. Now you could come back and say, "Hey, you just talked about me. How can you deny it?" Well, you see, the only reason I am now talking about you is that I am RESPONDING to you about you. You see, in case you're really as thick headed as you seem to act, the key word to take away with you from my message is RESPOND. That's why I am now talking about you and that's why I was forced to mention you before when I had to, now say it with me, RESPOND, to you and the others.
Now, I've been very calm and I hope I have clarified the situation. I really have nothing against you and I never have, I only have strong objections to being accused of saying things I never said or meant. And if you object to being accused of having a swelled head then I suggest you ponder the following, What do you call a person who insists your every innocent statement is all about them? Might you think they have a bit of an ego problem? If everything you said I came on and said, "stop talking about me" you might think I was a bit of a nut too. Well, now, let's all be friends and stop accusing others of saying things they never said or meant. Or at least if you do have to accuse someone to at least take their word for it when they tell you directly they never said or meant what you accuse them of. So the answer to your questions is that I was RESPONDING to others and yourself who brought you into the conversation, I never brought you into it, you and your followers did. Therefore I was forced to mention your name.
Now, sweet innocent Lamont, let's ask another question, Just who was it that made this whole thing personal by bringing up private past trade matters? Who oh who could that have been? You see, I believe a private trade especially one that never came to fruition should remain a private affair, not used to intimidate and threaten someone else from speaking out. I have nothing to be afraid of from you or anyone here because I always act honorably and honestly. So I fear no man. But since you like to broadcast the dirty linen, how can I expect you to see this point any more than you could conceive of a statment being made that DID NOT have anything to do with you, oh swelled headed center of the universe.;) You might have gotten the feeling that you're now talking to someone who won't back down and crawl off, you're right.
I was in sales and sales management my entire career, and one adage that I strongly believed in, was the KISS method "keep it simple stupid." I never met anyone who could say so much but say so little. Shorten it up pal. People go on the site to read a post not a message that the only thing not included, was the evolution of mankind.
You come across as articulate but in substance you are sadly lacking. Love folks who say one thing and then when confronted start to dance, and dance, and dance.
Harvey
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 12:51 PM Oh, if only I could have said it once and only once the very first time. Seems the simpler I made it, the more I kept being accused of the same thing. So, let's all play nice now.:)
savageamusement 07-07-2006, 12:59 PM I'm fighting a nasty sinus cold right now and i've got wrestling tickets for tomorrow so tonight is probably not a good idea. You know, I'm close enough to were savage lives that if you came out here, you could see us both ;)
Hahha
Tis true Lilhave she is about 45 minutes from me.
Want us to get the Ring ready for you....what kind of wrestling style do you like ;)
Inquiring minds wanna know.
I dunno what size dress you wear Jas- but we could get little Sitcoms Cheerleading Costumes and have the first ever sitcoms Brawl-
I know a few contenders
I think I have a rubber mat here somewhere...
lilhave 07-07-2006, 02:26 PM Hahha
Tis true Lilhave she is about 45 minutes from me.
Want us to get the Ring ready for you....what kind of wrestling style do you like ;)
Inquiring minds wanna know.
I dunno what size dress you wear Jas- but we could get little Sitcoms Cheerleading Costumes and have the first ever sitcoms Brawl-
I know a few contenders
I think I have a rubber mat here somewhere...
My favorite would have to be jello wrestling. Anything goes, no holds barred, 2 hour time limit, with no refs. I could clear up any sinus problems Jas, has and with you Savage, I want to practice my body presses.
Harvey
Lamont 07-07-2006, 02:42 PM Lets see EVERYONE WHO READ THE POST, thought i was being refered to--- NOT just 1 or 2 BUT EVERYONE WHO READ iT--- so we all must be wrong
and calling me a SWELLED HEAD
and calling lilhave a SIMPLE MIND
and calling jasimon names....
all in the thread? maybe im wrong, but i dont see how continuously insulting EVERY PERSON who disagrees with you makes someone look like anything other than a :censored:
nothing personal, but if u were truly misunderstood, why keep going on and on about it? and why insult and degrade other members of the board just because we read your words as different than you intended them?
i just dont get it, i mean if im wrong,i say im wrong-- i dont insult or attack and i dont keep it going on for 5 pages :eek:
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 03:22 PM aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand
/scene
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 04:05 PM You're right Lamont, you don't get it and you never will. After stating 6000 times over I never was talking about you and you still can't get it thru your thick skull you never will get it. And by the way, please stop speaking for "everyone" I know more than a few people who agree with me entirely. We're all not as dumb as you would have us. Everytime you think you speak for the group you merely make an ass out of your assumptions. "WE" don't all think the way you say "we" do. At any rate, let your swell head run rampant, go ahead and believe every time I speak a sentence it's all about you. Why every thought I think is all about you. You're my be all and end all. Whenever I talk it's really all about you. You know, you're really sick.
Lamont 07-07-2006, 04:12 PM You're right Lamont, you don't get it and you never will. After stating 6000 times over I never was talking about you and you still can't get it thru your thick skull you never will get it. And by the way, please stop speaking for "everyone" I know more than a few people who agree with me entirely. We're all not as dumb as you would have us. Everytime you think you speak for the group you merely make an ass out of your assumptions. "WE" don't all think the way you say "we" do. At any rate, let your swell head run rampant, go ahead and believe every time I speak a sentence it's all about you. Why every thought I think is all about you. You're my be all and end all. Whenever I talk it's really all about you. You know, you're really sick.
now im being called sick? how many insults must people have to endur b/c of this mess---- ok hazel, ill rephrase===NOT EVERYONE, but the overwhelming majority of those who replied to your comments agreed that you were obviously slamming me personally--- not a single person posted otherwise that you were not doing so--- i commented on it and again u made a jab at me, padre commented and u jabbed at me again, jasimon and lilhave commented--- and u belittled and insulted them, i commented again and u insulted me by calling me a SWELLED HEAD, and i commented again, politely and respectfully (AS ALL HAVE DONE THAT YOU CHOSE TO INSULT!) and u called me sick---- i think this thread has crossed the line and you are waaaaaay over the line here
even assuming that you meant NONE OF THIS TOWARDS ME, and all who thought so were wrong--- then the honorable and right thing to do would be apologize and move on and stop
but u keep insulting and degrading and being generally unpleasant
i just dont get it--- -and NO i wont get it any more clearly if u insult me again, which im sure u will
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 04:12 PM Please lock this thread - for the love of God!
Lamont 07-07-2006, 04:14 PM this has turned ugly and the other party seems to only wish to insult people who disagree with him, perhaps lockig is best
:wave:
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 04:21 PM Aww, sweet angel Lamont, never says anything against anyone. What a saint you are. Maybe you ought to try reading your own clap trap and you'll see the insults flying left and right. Who are you kidding? Just wanted you to know that "WE" aren't buying your bag of baloney.
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 04:23 PM :starwars
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 04:27 PM It takes two to tango & apparently no one is willing to let this thing go & move on.
Lamont 07-07-2006, 04:35 PM im no longer going to reply to this silliness
i have not once called u any rude or insulting names, however i have been called several-- others who agreed with me were also belittled
im NOT saying im an angel and of course, i can be quite vocal with the harsh words when someone deserves it--- such as one of "LAMONT'S ANGELS" or a scammer or such
HOWEVER i do not think that i deserve your anger- -- weve never done a deal or trade and other than some emails we have had no contact-- so i think the harsh words u r directing towards me are uncalled for and over the line
i have emailed u privately and if u wish to discuss this matter, i urge u to deal with me 1 on 1 instead of public lashing out as that serves no purpose other than to rile people up
thanks! :wave:
lilhave 07-07-2006, 04:35 PM It takes two to tango & apparently no one is willing to let this thing go & move on.
I can't take this anymore. I'm gonna tango with RedWhine
Harvey the Waltz king
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 04:40 PM I can't take this anymore. I'm gonna tango with RedWhine
Harvey the Waltz king
Hey, cool! (whispering) But won't Savage or JAS get upset?
Lamont 07-07-2006, 04:42 PM not a good dancer
but i am willing to set an oogle the girls! :crazy: :crazy:
lilhave 07-07-2006, 04:44 PM Hey, cool! (whispering) But won't Savage or JAS get upset?
Didn't Errol Flynn, John Garfied, and Clark Gable play the field? Look at this way. A night has 8 hours, three lovely females. The way I see it, two and half hours each with a half hour rest period.
Even my dreams aren't that good
Harvey
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 04:49 PM Didn't Errol Flynn, John Garfied, and Clark Gable play the field? Look at this way. A night has 8 hours, three lovely females. The way I see it, two and half hours each with a half hour rest period.
Even my dreams aren't that good
Harvey
:lol: :lol: But with JAS being into this whole wrestling thing...I don't want to get on her bad side. I'm about as good at wrestling as Lamont is at dancing. I might break a nail..and I just got them done. And Savage, well I don't want to get on her bad side, either. She's the best mod I've seen around here. And besides, who else would stand up for us against Darth Moderator?
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 04:57 PM :) I responded very nicely in the beginning, but after repeatedly being told what I said and then once again correcting those telling me what I said and then again being told what I said, well, ever hear of banging your head against the wall? What I don't get is why in the world is it so impossible for you to believe me the first, the very first time I told you and the others who agreed that I never was just talking about you. Why is that thought impossible to sink in? I can only repeat endlessly that if you thought I was talking about you you are wrong and that's as simple and as nice as I can be about it. Now, if you wanted to end this, you merely had to say, the first time I corrected you, "Sorry, I thought you were talking about me." And I would have most cordially told you, "no, I was talking about all of us who have big collections. No reason for you to single yourself out as the only one with a big collection who has this problem of dealing with others with less." See, how nice it could have gone. Instead I was ganged up on by your loyals and insulted and repeatedly told what I thought and what I said and what I meant. When I repeatedly corrected your notions, it was if no one heard a word, you went right back to your telling me what I said and meant again. So, you figure it out. I make a simple statement and you take it as a personal attack, I repeatedly say over and over it was not meant about you but all of us and you can't get it thru your head to take me at my word that I never had you in mind when I wrote my original thought. I had ALL OF US in mind. Now, you see how calm I am now? I was exactly this way and explained things exactly like this 400 messages ago but you didn't get it then and I can only hope you're hearing me now. If you still think I was singling you out, please just keep it to yourself, I really don't like being told what I say and what I think when you're very wrong about what it is you think I say and meant. I've politely told you you were mistaken & I've responded in kind when rudely talked to by you and your followers. If you just can't accept the fact I never had you in mind, please keep it to your self, I'm getting more than a little tired of repeating what I said and what I meant. My comment was not meant about you but about ALL of us, ME TOO. I thank you for your reasonableness in cooperation of not repeating to tell me what I think and what I say.
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 05:03 PM :) I responded very nicely in the beginning, but after repeatedly being told what I said and then once again correcting those telling me what I said and then again being told what I said, well, ever hear of banging your head against the wall? What I don't get is why in the world is it so impossible for you to believe me the first, the very first time I told you and the others who agreed that I never was just talking about you. Why is that thought impossible to sink in? I can only repeat endlessly that if you thought I was talking about you you are wrong and that's as simple and as nice as I can be about it. Now, if you wanted to end this, you merely had to say, the first time I corrected you, "Sorry, I thought you were talking about me." And I would have most cordially told you, "no, I was talking about all of us who have big collections. No reason for you to single yourself out as the only one with a big collection who has this problem of dealing with others with less." See, how nice it could have gone. Instead I was ganged up on by your loyals and insulted and repeatedly told what I thought and what I said and what I meant. When I repeatedly corrected your notions, it was if no one heard a word, you went right back to your telling me what I said and meant again. So, you figure it out. I make a simple statement and you take it as a personal attack, I repeatedly say over and over it was not meant about you but all of us and you can't get it thru your head to take me at my word that I never had you in mind when I wrote my original thought. I had ALL OF US in mind. Now, you see how calm I am now? I was exactly this way and explained things exactly like this 400 messages ago but you didn't get it then and I can only hope you're hearing me now. If you still think I was singling you out, please just keep it to yourself, I really don't like being told what I say and what I think when you're very wrong about what it is you think I say and meant. I've politely told you you were mistaken & I've responded in kind when rudely talked to by you and your followers. If you just can't accept the fact I never had you in mind, please keep it to your self, I'm getting more than a little tired of repeating what I said and what I meant. My comment was not meant about you but about ALL of us, ME TOO. I thank you for your reasonableness in cooperation of not repeating to tell me what I think and what I say.
LET IT GO.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 05:12 PM :lol: :lol: But with JAS being into this whole wrestling thing...I don't want to get on her bad side. I'm about as good at wrestling as Lamont is at dancing. I might break a nail..and I just got them done. And Savage, well I don't want to get on her bad side, either. She's the best mod I've seen around here. And besides, who else would stand up for us against Darth Moderator?
I love that Darth Moderator line.
Harvey
Lamont 07-07-2006, 05:16 PM :) I've politely told you you were mistaken & I've responded in kind when rudely talked to by you and your followers. If you just can't accept the fact I never had you in mind, please keep it to your self, I'm getting more than a little tired of repeating what I said and what I meant. My comment was not meant about you but about ALL of us, ME TOO. I thank you for your reasonableness in cooperation of not repeating to tell me what I think and what I say.
i wont begin to understand what u think
however if i was mistaken then so were many others
and believe it or not these people are NOT my "followers" just because they interpreted your words the same as me---- some of them i deal with a lot, some i have not traded with in ages--- so its NOT just my "loyalists" coming at you, it was a cross section of traders and posters who on their own, came to the same interpretation
if i was wrong -- we were all wrong, however misinterpreted your ORIGINAL post might have been-- is there any way to misinterpret calling me an "Ass" a "swell head" or "Sick"? hmmmmm.... ive been pondering what other interpretations there could be for that besides an attack on me----
if i was wrong then i was wrong, no excuses, and thats that--- however, even if all those who commented were wrong--- that is NO Excuse to turn it into a name calling affair and no excuse for personal belittlement towards me or any other board member and to be honest, if u reread the rules they spell that out-- anyhow, whats done is done, lets all (PLEASE GOD!) move on now and let things lie
ok hazel made his comments, i guess i misread them, and all those who emailed me about it and posted as such misread them too-- ok ill agree with you, now can we drop it?
jasimon1 07-07-2006, 05:16 PM I've got 4 boyfriends, he can have his three girlfriends (plus we can't forget the wife). And I hate breaking nails too but lucky for me my sister works in a salon and I get services dirt cheap :)
Lamont 07-07-2006, 05:17 PM Didn't Errol Flynn, John Garfied, and Clark Gable play the field? Look at this way. A night has 8 hours, three lovely females. The way I see it, two and half hours each with a half hour rest period.
Even my dreams aren't that good
Harvey
Harvey---- I knew Errol Flynn, I worked with Errol Flynn, I grew up with Errol Flynn---
Sir, you are No Errol Flynn@!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 05:26 PM I've got 4 boyfriends, he can have his three girlfriends (plus we can't forget the wife). And I hate breaking nails too but lucky for me my sister works in a salon and I get services dirt cheap :)
I lead such a dull life. :( I need to get out more. :lol:
(Envious of your dirt cheap salon services, too!) (pout)
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 05:29 PM I love that Darth Moderator line.
Harvey
Well, you know, he's a mod. But not always. So he/she doesn't have to behave like a mod. Eventhough their info says they are a mod. Because they are a mod. Somewhere. Just not here. (Confused look.) So it was a toss up between that or The Teflon Mod.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 05:34 PM I've got 4 boyfriends, he can have his three girlfriends (plus we can't forget the wife). And I hate breaking nails too but lucky for me my sister works in a salon and I get services dirt cheap :)
No,no,no, let's forget the wife. She has her TV shows to watch and Tivo is not working. Now, the jello pool is pretty big, and if your sister is interested, I'm sure we can work something out.
Harvey who is so excited
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 05:35 PM No,no,no, let's forget the wife. She has her TV shows to watch and Tivo is not working. Now, the jello pool is pretty big, and if your sister is interested, I'm sure we can work something out.
Harvey who is so excited
Harvey, who never makes opportunity knock twice.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 05:41 PM Well, you know, he's a mod. But not always. So he/she doesn't have to behave like a mod. Eventhough their info says they are a mod. Because they are a mod. Somewhere. Just not here. (Confused look.) So it was a toss up between that or The Teflon Mod.
Interesting you say that. I went one day to the third Gotti Sr. trial. It was early in the direct and kind of dry but still interesting. Plenty of big burly guys in dark suits with tons of jewlery.
Harvey
lilhave 07-07-2006, 05:42 PM Harvey, who never makes opportunity knock twice.
At my age it's not a knock, more of a light tap.
Harvey
RedWhine56 07-07-2006, 05:51 PM Interesting you say that. I went one day to the third Gotti Sr. trial. It was early in the direct and kind of dry but still interesting. Plenty of big burly guys in dark suits with tons of jewlery.
Harvey
I think that would be interesting. But I'd definitely be on my best behaviour. I'd rather take on JAS & Savage at the same time than tick off one of those guys.
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 06:30 PM :) You see Lamont, maybe you don't realize it when you do it. But you've been hurling insults at me all along, even in my last message to you free of all insults you once again came back and hurled another insult, to quote, "I wont begin to understand what u think". Now do you consider that a kindly remark? Here I was, once again trying to be nice, as I have in several of my messages, which you seem to ignore, only concentrating on the more colorful ones, trying to be nice not being insulting but explaining for the umpteenth time that I never had you in mind and you come back with another series of jabs and insults, all the while playing the poor innocent victim role of the bad old meanie Hazel. As for the names, I suggest you ask yourself what would you call someone who thinks all comments are made about himself? (swell head). What would you call someone who repeatedly doesn't get it when you explain over and over what you said and meant (thick, simple). And as for the ass remark, it was your assumption I was calling an ass, not you. Read carefully before you jump on that victim wagon.
Now you keep repeating over and over as many times as I tell you and your followers are wrong, that "everyone" else thought this and so did you. OK, let's just say that's true, even though I know not "everyone" thought that. But let's say it's true, it shouldn't matter to you what 100 people thought if the source himself tells you what he thought. I don't care if 1000 people all have the same mistaken notion, it's still mistaken and it's still wrong. Especially when the source of the comment himself tell you and the 1000 people over and over that you're mistaken and wrong in you assumptions. Does it not make any difference to you that the source himself is correcting the mistake of those who are telling you what the source meant and what the source said? You heard it from the horses mouth over and over what the horse meant, and still you keep referring to all the people that were also wrong besides yourself. As if if a 100 people are all wrong, well it must be right. Never mind what the source says what he says, believe the 100 mistaken interpreters of the source instead. So I guess we're just in 2 different worlds. I take people for their word and believe them when they tell me something and you'd rather keep repeating your and your friends mistaken and wrong conclusions. What the source himself says be darned, you're going to believe only what you first believed and nothing will ever seep into that skull except your own first mistaken notion. So I can only say, believe what you will, obviously nothing I the source says makes a bit of difference. You'll just go with what you want to believe and no amount of facts can change that. So believe whay you will, I can't do anything more than say you're wrong, even if a 100 other people also agree with your wrong notions. They're all wrong and so are you, who would know better than the source himself. But I suppose, you just say, what does the source know about what he thinks, I know more. Apparently that's the way you must believe, for after 1000's of corrections to your wrong notions you still can't accept the truth. But I am not mad at you, and I'm not mad at your wrong headed buddies. I think the real truth here is you’ve all been on this Sitcoms board too long, you're all a universe unto yourselves now and anyone outside that little world seems to speak a foreign language when you can’t understand the simplest of statements. I have nothing against you as I've stated before and I still don't. I just can not understand why you can't believe somebody when they tell you you're mistaken the first tiem they tell you that. OK, I wish you all a good weekend, and a more open mind and a trust that when someone tells you you're mistaken you'll believe it and not continue to repeat over and over your wrong conclusions.:cool:
lilhave 07-07-2006, 06:37 PM :) You see Lamont, maybe you don't realize it when you do it. But you've been hurling insults at me all along, even in my last message to you free of all insults you once again came back and hurled another insult, to quote, "I wont begin to understand what u think". Now do you consider that a kindly remark? Here I was, once again trying to be nice, as I have in several of my messages, which you seem to ignore, only concentrating on the more colorful ones, trying to be nice not being insulting but explaining for the umpteenth time that I never had you in mind and you come back with another series of jabs and insults, all the while playing the poor innocent victim role of the bad old meanie Hazel. As for the names, I suggest you ask yourself what would you call someone who thinks all comments are made about himself? (swell head). What would you call someone who repeatedly doesn't get it when you explain over and over what you said and meant (thick, simple). And as for the ass remark, it was your assumption I was calling an ass, not you. Read carefully before you jump on that victim wagon.
Now you keep repeating over and over as many times as I tell you and your followers are wrong, that "everyone" else thought this and so did you. OK, let's just say that's true, even though I know not "everyone" thought that. But let's say it's true, it shouldn't matter to you what 100 people thought if the source himself tells you what he thought. I don't care if 1000 people all have the same mistaken notion, it's still mistaken and it's still wrong. Especially when the source of the comment himself tell you and the 1000 people over and over that you're mistaken and wrong in you assumptions. Does it not make any difference to you that the source himself is correcting the mistake of those who are telling you what the source meant and what the source said? You heard it from the horses mouth over and over what the horse meant, and still you keep referring to all the people that were also wrong besides yourself. As if if a 100 people are all wrong, well it must be right. Never mind what the source says what he says, believe the 100 mistaken interpreters of the source instead. So I guess we're just in 2 different worlds. I take people for their word and believe them when they tell me something and you'd rather keep repeating your and your friends mistaken and wrong conclusions. What the source himself says be darned, you're going to believe only what you first believed and nothing will ever seep into that skull except your own first mistaken notion. So I can only say, believe what you will, obviously nothing I the source says makes a bit of difference. You'll just go with what you want to believe and no amount of facts can change that. So believe whay you will, I can't do anything more than say you're wrong, even if a 100 other people also agree with your wrong notions. They're all wrong and so are you, who would know better than the source himself. But I suppose, you just say, what does the source know about what he thinks, I know more. Apparently that's the way you must believe, for after 1000's of corrections to your wrong notions you still can't accept the truth. But I am not mad at you, and I'm not mad at your wrong headed buddies. I think the real truth here is you’ve all been on this Sitcoms board too long, you're all a universe unto yourselves now and anyone outside that little world seems to speak a foreign language when you can’t understand the simplest of statements. I have nothing against you as I've stated before and I still don't. I just can not understand why you can't believe somebody when they tell you you're mistaken the first tiem they tell you that. OK, I wish you all a good weekend, and a more open mind and a trust that when someone tells you you're mistaken you'll believe it and not continue to repeat over and over your wrong conclusions.:cool:
Even a dog knows when it's time to come in from the rain. How can I say it nicely?, please shut up.
Harvey
lilhave 07-07-2006, 06:42 PM I think that would be interesting. But I'd definitely be on my best behaviour. I'd rather take on JAS & Savage at the same time than tick off one of those guys.
Don't you fret. Come to N.Y., and I'll make sure no harm comes to MY RedWhine.
Harvey the protector to all women.
Hazel Anyday 07-07-2006, 06:44 PM You keep up those insults Harvey and you're going to spoil Lamont's notions that no one around here hurls insults but me. You and your ilk have all been tossing the put downs at me all along, most of the time I ignore them, sometimes I respond and put you in your place. But I guess it's easier to put yourself in the victim's role if you only read one side's insults and ignore the other's.
lilhave 07-07-2006, 06:51 PM You keep up those insults Harvey and you're going to spoil Lamont's notions that no one around here hurls insults but me. You and your ilk have all been tossing the put downs at me all along, most of the time I ignore them, sometimes I respond and put you in your place. But I guess it's easier to put yourself in the victim's role if you only read one side's insults and ignore the other's.
I'll make a broad statement. EVERYONE, not some, not a few but EVERYONE wants you stop your long winded, lengthy,endless thoughts. At this point no one cares if your right or wrong but like a screechy record it doesn't end. I tried to switch it to wrestling, running after the girls etc. but you won't stop.
You keep pounding away like a butcher running amok. Stop, stop, stop.
Harvey
Michaelarcangel 07-07-2006, 07:25 PM I have a ????? Why do all you traders (Not Lamont! I grew up on Sanford & Son) with huge lists "Thousands" of shows list them and then will not trade? (lmao)
I must admit if it were not for threads like these I would have no life at all!:happyface
lilhave 07-07-2006, 07:38 PM I have a ????? Why do all you traders (Not Lamont! I grew up on Sanford & Son) with huge lists "Thousands" of shows list them and then will not trade? (lmao)
I must admit if it were not for threads like these I would have no life at all!:happyface
As the expression goes"all things are not created equal" There are two different types frequenting the board. One is the trader who collects or trades for things he or she enjoys. If you have something that interests them they are more then glad to trade with you. Most have specific interests, it may be a time frame, in my case the 50's and 60's, or it may be a particular type of show, comedy etc. The second type is the trader/seller. In most cases this person trades in order to have larger inventory to sell. They have no interest in retail as they can get at any time and want if possible full run as it's easier to sell. When you offer a item for trade, the thought of will I enjoy it, is not paramount but "can I sell it" If you have something that they believe is not on other lists they will trade with you. Most experienced traders know what's on most lists, what isn't so common and can act accordingly. Trading is a two way street. You want but you have to offer something in return. To the trader, another series, to the trader/seller, a series or cash.
Harvey
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 07:52 PM :) You see Lamont, maybe you don't realize it when you do it. But you've been hurling insults at me all along, even in my last message to you free of all insults you once again came back and hurled another insult, to quote, "I wont begin to understand what u think". Now do you consider that a kindly remark? Here I was, once again trying to be nice, as I have in several of my messages, which you seem to ignore, only concentrating on the more colorful ones, trying to be nice not being insulting but explaining for the umpteenth time that I never had you in mind and you come back with another series of jabs and insults, all the while playing the poor innocent victim role of the bad old meanie Hazel. As for the names, I suggest you ask yourself what would you call someone who thinks all comments are made about himself? (swell head). What would you call someone who repeatedly doesn't get it when you explain over and over what you said and meant (thick, simple). And as for the ass remark, it was your assumption I was calling an ass, not you. Read carefully before you jump on that victim wagon.
Now you keep repeating over and over as many times as I tell you and your followers are wrong, that "everyone" else thought this and so did you. OK, let's just say that's true, even though I know not "everyone" thought that. But let's say it's true, it shouldn't matter to you what 100 people thought if the source himself tells you what he thought. I don't care if 1000 people all have the same mistaken notion, it's still mistaken and it's still wrong. Especially when the source of the comment himself tell you and the 1000 people over and over that you're mistaken and wrong in you assumptions. Does it not make any difference to you that the source himself is correcting the mistake of those who are telling you what the source meant and what the source said? You heard it from the horses mouth over and over what the horse meant, and still you keep referring to all the people that were also wrong besides yourself. As if if a 100 people are all wrong, well it must be right. Never mind what the source says what he says, believe the 100 mistaken interpreters of the source instead. So I guess we're just in 2 different worlds. I take people for their word and believe them when they tell me something and you'd rather keep repeating your and your friends mistaken and wrong conclusions. What the source himself says be darned, you're going to believe only what you first believed and nothing will ever seep into that skull except your own first mistaken notion. So I can only say, believe what you will, obviously nothing I the source says makes a bit of difference. You'll just go with what you want to believe and no amount of facts can change that. So believe whay you will, I can't do anything more than say you're wrong, even if a 100 other people also agree with your wrong notions. They're all wrong and so are you, who would know better than the source himself. But I suppose, you just say, what does the source know about what he thinks, I know more. Apparently that's the way you must believe, for after 1000's of corrections to your wrong notions you still can't accept the truth. But I am not mad at you, and I'm not mad at your wrong headed buddies. I think the real truth here is you’ve all been on this Sitcoms board too long, you're all a universe unto yourselves now and anyone outside that little world seems to speak a foreign language when you can’t understand the simplest of statements. I have nothing against you as I've stated before and I still don't. I just can not understand why you can't believe somebody when they tell you you're mistaken the first tiem they tell you that. OK, I wish you all a good weekend, and a more open mind and a trust that when someone tells you you're mistaken you'll believe it and not continue to repeat over and over your wrong conclusions.:cool:
Get a friggin blog!
Captspiffy 07-07-2006, 07:59 PM Pru,
Send me a private email. I have Family affair and I will gladly trade with you for it. It's 31 dvds. send me a list of what you have and I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Mike:)
Lamont 07-07-2006, 10:09 PM I have a ????? Why do all you traders (Not Lamont! I grew up on Sanford & Son) with huge lists "Thousands" of shows list them and then will not trade? (lmao)
I must admit if it were not for threads like these I would have no life at all!:happyface
ok ill answer for most of us with big lists--- WE DO TRADE--- look at the feedback section-=-- u see TONS of good comments for LAMONT, Loren, padre, etc etc etc
all people with big lists--- all people who trade a lot with lots of people--- the truth is, i trade with an average of 12 people a month! BUT the other truth is that sometimes, trades dont happen---- either people send me a list and EVERYTHING i allready have, or stuff that i dont want--- and even in that case--- i try to work it out somehow, and often trade for non disc items
most of the big trades are always open to trades, just not every trade works out--:wave:
digitalmonkey 07-07-2006, 10:33 PM ok ill answer for most of us with big lists--- WE DO TRADE--- look at the feedback section-=-- u see TONS of good comments for LAMONT, Loren, padre, etc etc etc
all people with big lists--- all people who trade a lot with lots of people--- the truth is, i trade with an average of 12 people a month! BUT the other truth is that sometimes, trades dont happen---- either people send me a list and EVERYTHING i allready have, or stuff that i dont want--- and even in that case--- i try to work it out somehow, and often trade for non disc items
most of the big trades are always open to trades, just not every trade works out--:wave:
Padre hates Canadians. :D
padre 07-07-2006, 10:42 PM Oh, if it just that simple! No, I just don't do trades outside the US because of the postal system. Too many packages lost, no tracking (without paying big $$). Just not up for it anymore.
savageamusement 07-08-2006, 12:13 AM As much as I hate locking this, due to the fact there are some sensible, good comments in it- there seems to be no end to the snide comments and jabs from another.
|