View Full Version : Was it necessary for Raj to take Shirley...


Ireneparalegal
03-25-2006, 03:21 AM
as his "wife" to the dept. store regarding Dee supposedly stealing the necklace? I mean, this is a dept. store manager, who was he to say that both parents would need to be there? In reality, one parent would have been sufficient. Raj could have told this man that.

GARFIELDKOOL
03-25-2006, 11:49 AM
as his "wife" to the dept. store regarding Dee supposedly stealing the necklace? I mean, this is a dept. store manager, who was he to say that both parents would need to be there? In reality, one parent would have been sufficient. Raj could have told this man that.

I thought one parent would have been necessary myself. Anyway, they both overracted a little too much in that scene.

Brian Damage
03-25-2006, 01:16 PM
Yeah, but you have to admit that Shirley was hysterical as Mama. :lol:

CindyRoxiesLair2006
04-01-2006, 04:27 PM
I thought one parent would have been necessary myself. Anyway, they both overracted a little too much in that scene.

Overacting is precisely RIGHT!
I mean, all this mess about "Apple Pie" and "Honey Lamb"...aww, c'mon, NOW...
Even though it was a successful facade in getting Dee off the hook and so forth, Raj and Shirley didn't have to spread/shovel it THAT thick! LMAO...
:rolleyes: :lol: :happyface