|
View Full Version : Should Don Knotts have been in the Zoo Opening Credits since he was the TVFactFan 02-08-2006, 04:04 PM Landlord on the show? I mean who really hangs out with their landlord at the Zoo?-lol I think his name should have just been shown but to see him walking around the Zoo with Larry, jack and the girls looked kind of silly to me. I Love John Ritter 02-09-2006, 01:36 AM It wouldn't be the same if he wasn't shown and just his name was there. Everyone else was shown. Ireneparalegal 02-09-2006, 01:38 AM It wouldn't be the same if he wasn't shown and just his name was there. Everyone else was shown. I agree. He was a star like the rest of them. as for being at the zoo, maybe a little far-fetched for a landlord/renters to be together, but if they are friends (which they were) then it's cool. comedyfreak 02-09-2006, 10:38 AM In real life he wouldn't have been hanging out anywhere with them, but since it's a tv show it is only fitting he there too. gilligan fanatic 02-09-2006, 11:28 AM Should he not have been at the peer on season 4-5 then? TVFactFan 02-09-2006, 11:40 AM Should he not have been at the peer on season 4-5 then? Well at the Pier he wasn;t walking around with the Trio so I guess that was ok-lol Brian Damage 02-09-2006, 11:50 AM Mr. Furley was a friend to the trio. I really don't find it that outrageous. gilligan fanatic 02-09-2006, 11:53 AM Mr. Furley was a friend to the trio. I really don't find it that outrageous. the trio was Furley's only friends-lol. PrettyinPink55 02-09-2006, 06:41 PM Mr. Furley was a friend to the trio. I really don't find it that outrageous. I agree |