T.O has informed the eagles that he won;t be able to play this Sunday against the Redskins and next Monday Night against the Dallas Cowboys which will really make the Eagles offense ONE_DIMESIONAL-lol He injured his ankle in the denver game and said it's no way he can play against the Skins and Cowboys. TO is WILD-LOL

This is bad news for my fantasy team.

T.O has informed the eagles that he won;t be able to play this Sunday against the Redskins and next Monday Night against the Dallas Cowboys which will really make the Eagles offense ONE_DIMESIONAL-lol He injured his ankle in the denver game and said it's no way he can play against the Skins and Cowboys. TO is WILD-LOL

I heard about that, but you know what, we don't need a charity victory. I think the Skins are good enough to beat the Eagles with or without T.O. We came close twice last season. I prefer if T.O. played. If the Skins beat Philly without T.O., then critics like yourself would say the only reason they won was because T.O. didn't play. You're damned if you do, and damned if you don't.

I went to the Redskins website today and read where former Redskin wide receiver Darnierian McCants could replace T.O.

TO is such a fool. This is a guy who broke his leg and was back in a few short weeks. Now he sprains his ankle and claims he can't play? It is obvious he is unhappy and wants out of Philly.

A little too early for TO to proclaim he won't play against the Cowboys- that is a week and a half away.

This is the same guy who against all medical probability was able to play in the Super Bowl last year.

If anything, I think it may be a mental ploy by TO to get the Cowboys to prepare a game plan against the Eagles without him- which in no way will the Cowboys do.

Either that or he is playing games with Eagles management to get something out of it- He informed the Eagles? Usually don't team doctors and staff make these decisions?

But anyway, anyone really want to bet that Owens won't play against Dallas?

A little too early for TO to proclaim he won't play against the Cowboys- that is a week and a half away.

This is the same guy who against all medical probability was able to play in the Super Bowl last year.

If anything, I think it may be a mental ploy by TO to get the Cowboys to prepare a game plan against the Eagles without him- which in no way will the Cowboys do.

Either that or he is playing games with Eagles management to get something out of it- He informed the Eagles? Usually don't team doctors and staff make these decisions?

But anyway, anyone really want to be that Owens won't play against Dallas?


Just sounds odd to me that he said the Dallas Game too-lol You would think he would just take it one week at a time. He could have made a decision about whether he could play in the Dallas game AFTER the Redskins Game

I heard about that, but you know what, we don't need a charity victory. I think the Skins are good enough to beat the Eagles with or without T.O. We came close twice last season. I prefer if T.O. played. If the Skins beat Philly without T.O., then critics like yourself would say the only reason they won was becaue T.O. didn't play. You're damned if you do, and damned if you don't.

I went to the Redskins website today and read where former Redskin wide receiver Darnierian McCants could replace T.O.
There's my man...you tell him Kool. S**T, my Dallas has shown that they have one thing in mind 24/7, that is, winning, winning and more winning. I knew watching them at practice this past summer there was going to be nothing but happy Dallas fans this year.:D