benjamoon
08-17-2005, 11:53 PM
I'd like to start this mini rant by saying that this is in NO WAY criticizing "Good Times" or "Night Court"
---
People are always complaining about the lack of the very old classics of the 50s and 60s on TV Land and Nick at Nite, on this board and especially on the tvland.com boards. TV Land's defense is that the shows don't perform nearly as well and point to the WB and N@N's 20th weekend as proof. It is an obvious fact that those marathons were huge disappointments while the Good Times and Night Court ratings for the marathon were through the roof. I believe that happened because of three reasons
1) It IS true that there is not as much an audience for the 50s and 60s shows. Plain and simple. As sad as it is, they don't receive massive ratings BUT they could receive better ratings if:
2) TV Land ADVERTISED it more. Almost EVERY commercial break for 2 weeks before their respective marathons, had commercials advertising for Good Times and Night Court. There were also many pop-ups during pretty much every TV Land show for both those marathons. For the N@N 20th and WB marathons, there was an extreme shortage in promotion. I realize that the WB marathon kept switching on and off so that's an excuse but there is NO excuse for the lack of promotion on N@N's 20th. They only promoted the part that was on Nick at Nite, and had very very few for the TV Land portion of the celebration. I'm positive that many people had no idea that the marathon was even on. I know ppl who visit these boards and other sites like it do know that it is on, but the average TV Land viewer most likely did not.
3) It is without question, more ratings savvy to show the SAME show over and over again. People might see an episode of "Good Times" or "Night Court" on Saturday morning and realize it's on all weekend, and plan to tune in for a couple hours on Sunday for example. They can't do that with a marathon like the WB one and the N@N's 20th. Again, a casual TV Land viewer would have NO idea when some shows they may want to see are on in a multi-show marathon but if they would be well aware if it was consistently the same show. TVLtheLink even admitted that the same show airing back to back does well, hence the many twice as nice, fandemoniums, block party summers, and mini-marathons that have been shown over the years on N@N and TV Land
That is why I think it's not fair to compare the ratings of the Good Times/Night Court marathon to the WB/N@N's 20th marathon. I think TV Land does not maximize the viewership potential of older shows mainly due to lack of advertising and continuity although I am well aware that they still would not do as well as the newer shows, although I think they would do BETTER than they do currently.
I'm very curious to hear responses to this, if you think I'm on to something or completely nuts, please let me know
---
People are always complaining about the lack of the very old classics of the 50s and 60s on TV Land and Nick at Nite, on this board and especially on the tvland.com boards. TV Land's defense is that the shows don't perform nearly as well and point to the WB and N@N's 20th weekend as proof. It is an obvious fact that those marathons were huge disappointments while the Good Times and Night Court ratings for the marathon were through the roof. I believe that happened because of three reasons
1) It IS true that there is not as much an audience for the 50s and 60s shows. Plain and simple. As sad as it is, they don't receive massive ratings BUT they could receive better ratings if:
2) TV Land ADVERTISED it more. Almost EVERY commercial break for 2 weeks before their respective marathons, had commercials advertising for Good Times and Night Court. There were also many pop-ups during pretty much every TV Land show for both those marathons. For the N@N 20th and WB marathons, there was an extreme shortage in promotion. I realize that the WB marathon kept switching on and off so that's an excuse but there is NO excuse for the lack of promotion on N@N's 20th. They only promoted the part that was on Nick at Nite, and had very very few for the TV Land portion of the celebration. I'm positive that many people had no idea that the marathon was even on. I know ppl who visit these boards and other sites like it do know that it is on, but the average TV Land viewer most likely did not.
3) It is without question, more ratings savvy to show the SAME show over and over again. People might see an episode of "Good Times" or "Night Court" on Saturday morning and realize it's on all weekend, and plan to tune in for a couple hours on Sunday for example. They can't do that with a marathon like the WB one and the N@N's 20th. Again, a casual TV Land viewer would have NO idea when some shows they may want to see are on in a multi-show marathon but if they would be well aware if it was consistently the same show. TVLtheLink even admitted that the same show airing back to back does well, hence the many twice as nice, fandemoniums, block party summers, and mini-marathons that have been shown over the years on N@N and TV Land
That is why I think it's not fair to compare the ratings of the Good Times/Night Court marathon to the WB/N@N's 20th marathon. I think TV Land does not maximize the viewership potential of older shows mainly due to lack of advertising and continuity although I am well aware that they still would not do as well as the newer shows, although I think they would do BETTER than they do currently.
I'm very curious to hear responses to this, if you think I'm on to something or completely nuts, please let me know