I've just finished watching a documentary on TV about Michael Jackson and his secretive life involving the young boys he surrounds himself with. I personally think he is innocent, but just extremely nieve and a bit psychologically damaged due to his turbulent childhood. I think it will be interesting to see how his court case develops when it starts next week.
What do you guys think?

I'm pretty sure there's more going on at the Neverland Ranch than just slumber parties.

Hmm, I'm starting to believe him less...but I still for bad for him because he's ****ed in the head. Damn shame. ABC is a good song.

Ah I don't know. I feel bad for the guy because of just everything he's going through and I don't know.. he's just messed up. I like his and Janet's music though :p

Guilty.

i think he's guilty. but being sort of ****ed in the head i guess he has a slight excuse. i dunno lol

I really don't know.....I think people take advantage of him because he looks weird, and because of that fact everyone assumes he is guilty.


Would you still think he was guilty if he still looked like he did 20 years ago?

Guilty

I want to say innocent, but I think he may be guilty. He will probably get off on this one.

I wish he was innocent.

Hmm, I'm starting to believe him less...but I still for bad for him because he's ****ed in the head. Damn shame. ABC is a good song.I just now realized I didn't right "feel bad" but "for bad" ha

I didn't rightGod, what the hell is wrong with my brain? :lol:

innocent

I wanna say he's innocent but i don't know what to think about Michael cause he's so weird. I just wish he hadn't dealt with kids at all so that he wouldn't be in this mess.

I really don't know.....I think people take advantage of him because he looks weird, and because of that fact everyone assumes he is guilty.


Would you still think he was guilty if he still looked like he did 20 years ago?

Do you mean because of his skin color? Or his nose? Even if he was purple with no nose, I would still think he was guilty. If the evidence is there, I would pretty much think he's guilty, no matter how he looks.

Innocent the first time, guilty now.

Do you mean because of his skin color? Or his nose? Even if he was purple with no nose, I would still think he was guilty. If the evidence is there, I would pretty much think he's guilty, no matter how he looks.

well thats a good thing...I hate how people let looks, etc. influence their opinions.

I wonder why he isn't happily married. He has these oddball relationships, Two marriages, 3 children and ends up divorced. I'd be going out on dates or bringing dates into the house. Playdates with young boys seems odd.

I will let a court of law reach that decision.

It saddens me how some people, including members on this board, have no
respect for our judicial system and due process of the law. lighten up man - this is just an informal OPINION poll - it shall have NO INFLUENCE on the proceedings of any court ANYWHERE.

whether Jackson is ACTUALLY guilty or innocent is up to the courts to decide, but he is definately guilty of poor judgement which has led to this type of public speculation about his relationships with young boys.

Guilty.

Guilty. I don't care if he had a screwed up childhood or not. There are a lot of people that have, but you don't see them having sex with boys.

Guilty. I don't care if he had a screwed up childhood or not. There are a lot of people that have, but you don't see them having sex with boys.

why do you think he's guilty?

I think he's guilty because I'm sorry but I don't buy the story about letting boys sleep in your bed. I mean I know Jackson also seems to have a problem with common sense, but still. A moron could figure out, that's not a bright idea. Why do you think he's innocent? Either way he'll get off, again. He's famous, and famous people are given a slap on the wrist when it comes to the law.

I don't know if he's innocent or guilty to be honest...I never saw the evidence. But in his defense I don't see why any mother in their right mind would let their son stay at a man (who they don't even know)'s house unless they were after money. So I really don't think it's entirely his fault.

I don't know if he's innocent or guilty to be honest...I never saw the evidence. But in his defense I don't see why any mother in their right mind would let their son stay at a man (who they don't even know)'s house unless they were after money. So I really don't think it's entirely his fault.

That is a good point. I was wondering why the parents would allow their kids to stay with him. I mean given what happened in the 90s with him, I wouldn't want my children near him just to be safe.

I don't know if he's innocent or guilty to be honest...I never saw the evidence. But in his defense I don't see why any mother in their right mind would let their son stay at a man (who they don't even know)'s house unless they were after money. So I really don't think it's entirely his fault.Ah, yeah. Good point.

I think he's guilty because I'm sorry but I don't buy the story about letting boys sleep in your bed. I mean I know Jackson also seems to have a problem with common sense, but still. A moron could figure out, that's not a bright idea. Why do you think he's innocent? Either way he'll get off, again. He's famous, and famous people are given a slap on the wrist when it comes to the law.


Martha Stewart went to jail.