View Full Version : Interview w/ Eric Monte - creator of Good Times & Jeffersons


knl9674
12-09-2004, 02:36 PM
i read a great blog by an AA published journalist (NY Times, SFC, etc) and has several columns on AA newsites etc. He has been on the hunt for Eric Monte as a true fan of Good Times - which I just realized.

At any rate, he located the man, they became friends and he has recorded his interview/conversations with him and they discuss many different topics of interest as it relates to the show - many you will be surprised to hear and know.

Teaser:
-his thoughts on the role of JJ
-why he left the show
-tv today

AND...this officially puts an end to the longstanding feud about whether or not Good Times was a spin off of Maude. From the horse's mouth for all you that thought it was, IT WAS NOT. Per Eric, he had thought of the idea of GT before Maude even aired. When ERolle found out she was getting her own show, she wanted to use the same name she had on Maude, plain and simple. NO SPIN OFF. This ends the debate and further speculation.


VERY interesting and a must read. i'm going to post it over on The Jeffersons board as well.

Go to his blog site: www.jimiizrael.com

It's the first entry dated 12-8.

Post up your comments and happy reading......

W.J. Griffin
12-11-2004, 06:02 PM
Jimi Izrael is off the hook!!!

Reading his conversations with Eric Monte reveals just how much contempt American tv producers have for their dreative people...and their audiences. Under the same circumstances, one can understand Me. Monte's frustration and bitterness with our mass-media outlets. And his comments about "Amos 'n' Andy" and "Good Times", as well as his admiration for "I Love Lucy", is truly illuminating.

So our TV Analyzer Solomon was right all along! :D

TVFactFan
12-12-2004, 01:05 AM
Originally posted by W.J. Griffin
Jimi Izrael is off the hook!!!

Reading his conversations with Eric Monte reveals just how much contempt American tv producers have for their dreative people...and their audiences. Under the same circumstances, one can understand Me. Monte's frustration and bitterness with our mass-media outlets. And his comments about "Amos 'n' Andy" and "Good Times", as well as his admiration for "I Love Lucy", is truly illuminating.

So our TV Analyzer Solomon was right all along! :D


That's what I have been trying to say for two years but no one wanted to listen to me-LOL

knl9674
12-13-2004, 10:20 AM
i've always said that Good Times WAS NOT a spin off of Maude...but didn't have anything solid to back it up.

Gee...doesn't it feel wonderful to be right?! :D

James"Thunder"Early
12-13-2004, 04:10 PM
I still say it's a spinoff. it is how the network placed it. it wasn't written as a spinoff but, it turned into one when it was picked up.

knl9674
12-13-2004, 04:18 PM
heeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeee we go.

you have the information right in front of your face to show you that it was NOT a spin off but you still are holding on to it. do you understand what "spin off" means - it is planned. it is purposeful. it takes the concept characters of one show and rolls it into another show while commonly making references to the original so the connection is not questions.

this is not the case with Good Times.

tell me this: how can a show be a spin off when it was created PRIOR to the show you're saying it was spun off from?

end the madness and accept the fact that you are wrong.



:rolleyes:

James"Thunder"Early
12-13-2004, 04:41 PM
That's just my opinion. I think when Esther Rolle wanted to use her name from Maude, the network decided to call it a spinoff to give a midseason show a boost. what I meant it is a spinoff in name only.

knl9674
12-13-2004, 05:24 PM
please note:

1. you can have an opinion. but when you are presented with facts to the contrary, your opinion is shot. the article came from the CREATOR and HEAD WRITER OF THE SHOW. he tells you it's not a spin off and you still are popping off that in your opinion, it is.
oooook.

2. the networks NEVER called GT a spin off. audience members created that buzz. the network knew they were not supposed to be related.

3. to further PROVE this point: florida's husband's name on Maude was NOT James. florida did not have a job on the first GT episode. Maude was not set in Chicago.

4. esther rolle only wanted to keep the NAME she had on Maude, not the character. there is a difference.

someone is in deep denial. believe what you will but also know that you are

horribly
seriously
terribly

incorrect.

i'm done.

Caffeine King
12-13-2004, 06:52 PM
:cool: Cool interview...

W.J. Griffin
12-13-2004, 10:43 PM
I think we're all missing the bigger picture here..

SOLOMON WAS RIGHT!!!

Line forms on the right for deep-fried CROW! ;)

Brian Damage
12-14-2004, 09:19 PM
We all knew GT was created before Good Times. The fact is Florida Evans is still Florida Evans. A maid on Maude and a former maid on GT. Those are the facts. GT is still spun off of Maude.

TVFactFan
12-14-2004, 10:02 PM
Originally posted by Brian Damage
We all knew GT was created before Good Times. The fact is Florida Evans is still Florida Evans. A maid on Maude and a former maid on GT. Those are the facts. GT is still spun off of Maude.


Brian i have too many people on my side now, your argument is weak buddy-LOL Give it up Brian!!!!!! I was right

Brian Damage
12-14-2004, 11:07 PM
LOL I won't give up because Florida is still Florida.

Brian Damage
12-14-2004, 11:21 PM
I'll tell you what Solomon, you get me what I asked of you and I'll begrudgingly admit GT was NOT a spinoff. ;)

TVFactFan
12-14-2004, 11:27 PM
Originally posted by Brian Damage
I'll tell you what Solomon, you get me what I asked of you and I'll begrudgingly admit GT was NOT a spinoff. ;)


I recorded Judge Judy Today but didn't see those two comercials. I will record Judge Judy the rest of the week and see if I catch them.

Brian Damage
12-14-2004, 11:32 PM
:notworthy

W.J. Griffin
12-16-2004, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by Brian Damage
:notworthy

So...how would you like your crow served?