...and named them Gertrude and Lester. And tried to use them as a ploy to get her career goin again...

http://datelinehollywood.com/archives/2004/12/06/talk-of-the-wood/

Not sure if i buy it or not...what about you?
She may have had twins wich is really cool...but she doesn't seem like the kinda person that would use her kids as a publicity stunt.

Woah therre lol i just read the post and all and lemme see the link..woah i dont know if she had twins..she didnt look pregnant in the disaster series or anything..Aurora is barely 9 months old..almost. I don't think so..lemme see that! lol damn..thats gotta be a joke someone pulled..like her hoax about her death and all.:confused:

That has to be a lie..Nancy McKeon i have a feeling and i think i know she is not like that..someones lying..prolly the person who always tries to put fake things in about her..thats just too not true

I doubt it's true...

I don't by it for a second. Like any doctor would actually induce early labor because a publicist says so. Also the spelling in that article was atrocious; if people are going to try to shake others up they should have an editor.

i don't think it's true either...I mean, She'd had to have like gotten pregnant imediately after her daughter was born....not that it isn't possible,but i don't know why anyone would want to have kids so close together.

:rolleyes:

1 reason it's fake. The babies weren't mentioned in that TVGuide interview she gave in November. That was publicity. Should have said something.

Another reason. Gertrude and Lester. That's the best she could do? Gwyneth named her kid Apple. She could have named hers like, Banana and Mango. She probably would have made them worse, had she had twins, and if she did it for attention, which I doubt she'd do.

I totally do not believe it. It's just a hoax. It would have been very unlikely that she could have gotten pregnant immediately after Aurora was born, she didn't look pregnant in the miniseries, and I don't think that she would do that for publicity. I can't imagine anyone would want kids that close together.

Besides...I thought of another point. She barely even publicized Aurora's birth....if that's even her name. We know nothing about her. She's really private. I highly doubt she'd decide to use her kids for publicity now, and not earlier.

Yeah,She'll probably even be like Lisa Whelchel,not
want her kids to get into show business or anything like
that. What's happening to Nancy McKeon these days?
It's like she saying ''Hey Hollywood,I don't even exist!''

Originally posted by JoCool
Yeah,She'll probably even be like Lisa Whelchel,not
want her kids to get into show business or anything like
that. What's happening to Nancy McKeon these days?
It's like she saying ''Hey Hollywood,I don't even exist!''

Well, Nancy was just in that miniseries. Plus, having a baby takes a lot of time. I think she's just a private person, which is a good thing in that business.

She said on the Rosie show she wouldn't want her children in show business I believe

Didn't Julia Roberts name her new twins some stupid names?

Originally posted by JoCool
Didn't Julia Roberts name her new twins some stupid names?

Phinnaeus Walter and Hazel Patricia:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Nancy didn't have twins! And she would care less if her child grew up and went into show business like she did!