KJH278
11-03-2004, 10:28 PM
The WWE released Gail Kim, Chuck Palumbo and Nidia from their contracts today. We wish them the best in their future endeavors.
|
View Full Version : Gail Kim, Chuck Palumbo, Nidia released KJH278 11-03-2004, 10:28 PM The WWE released Gail Kim, Chuck Palumbo and Nidia from their contracts today. We wish them the best in their future endeavors. Miss Golden 11-04-2004, 03:20 AM I can't believe Gail Kim is on the list, she has been on Raw a lot lately, as for Palumbo, I have not seen him anywhere but Sunday Night Heat since he got traded to Raw back in March and Nidia is seldom used in the Women's Division. Skywalker 11-04-2004, 03:46 AM :( I liked Gail Kim and Nidia. pna42 11-04-2004, 04:54 AM If the WWE wanted to get rid of women they viewed as expendable, they should have deopped Dawn Marie and Torrie from Smackdown. Torrie can't wrestle. Dawn Marie just pretty much shimmies and shakes and says, ''Look at me. Aint I pretty!!'' Neither has much of a storyline and neither adds anything to the show. carsonfan 11-04-2004, 12:49 PM Gail Kim shocks me. Palumbo hasn't done anything since the Billy and Chuck angle. Nidia can't wrestle. I wonder what is going on behind the scenes of WWE. Of all six wrestlers they released in the past few days,Gail Kim should of been kept. She is a talented wrestler. TNA is watching very carefully of whom WWE is releasing. Don't be surprise if you see any these superstars particularly Billy Gunn show up on the Victory Road ppv this Sunday. Chain Gang Member 11-04-2004, 12:53 PM Originally posted by pna42 If the WWE wanted to get rid of women they viewed as expendable, they should have deopped Dawn Marie and Torrie from Smackdown. Torrie can't wrestle. Dawn Marie just pretty much shimmies and shakes and says, ''Look at me. Aint I pretty!!'' Neither has much of a storyline and neither adds anything to the show. I think after the feud between her and Jackie,Dawn Marie should be released.She ain't worth nothing unless she's a nuscence in a relationship Sargent Stewie 11-05-2004, 12:40 AM Tsk, tsk, tsk... |