Have you noticed that in the last episode or maybe in Terri episodes in general (I'm not sure cause I don't really watch Terri episodes) Jack and Janet never mentioned Chrissy again. I mean in the last episode they acted like Terri has been there from the beginning. Have they forgotten that Chrissy used to live there and she was their best friend too, I think the producers could have at least had somebody mention Chrissy in the last episode I think they owed it to Chrissy fans.

Yeah! Chrissy gave them their best ratings, and also, why didn't they mention Lana, The Ropers, or Cindy? All they did was try to make a pilot for a show, instead of a finale

I know!well maybe terri wouldn't have said anything because she never met Chrissy but Jack could have said something like remember when I first moved in and Chrissy was here or something like that.

Yeah, but if u saw the show wit Lucy Ball hosting the best parts of the show, they mostly talked bout Chrissy and the entire cast.

------------------
I <3 LUCY!
Lucy" I saw a sign that said take one so i took one.After that i took anything even if it didnt say take on. I took a bright new bicycle, a shiny new penny. I even took a little boy... yeah but my mommy made me take him back."

I know they talked about her on the tribute episode, but I'm saying they didn't even bring her up when Terri was around on an actual episode. They made it sound like Terri was there the whole time.

I blame the producers. They're the ones who dictated how the show would go. It was wrong not to mention Chrissy but their problems with Suzanne was probably the reason.

And I agree with you Sean Snow, what was up with not mentioning the Ropers in the last episode or having them show up for Janet's wedding? Norman Fell and Audrey Lindely as far as I know never had problems with them but it was like "Oh yeah you were on the show but we don't need you guys anymore we've got Don Knotts and Priscilla Barnes now." Don't get me wrong I love those two but it was the last episode and they should have brought the Ropers back and also Cindy. They never would bring Chrissy back even though it would've made the ratings go through the roof. Man, they were dumb.


[This message has been edited by Rama Mageesh (edited 10-01-2001).]

If the ropers and Cindy would have come back for the last episode then it would have been better.I hated the last episode and they could have also said something like Chrissy was going to come but she had to do something somewhere else or something and then at least they could have said something.

Having the Ropers and Cindy back would have given the show a great final touch. Better yet, bringing Chrissy back.

Those producers are soooo....UGH! Chrissy was Jack and Janet's best friend!!!!! How could she not be invited to the wedding? And CINDY? She was Jack and Janet's best friend too! Do they hate the Snows or something? And this one annoys me soooo much....THE ROPERS!!!! They were Jack and Janet's FIRST landlords! Gosh!

Yeah, the producers were way too concerned with setting up "Three's a Crowd" to deal with little touches like bringing back old characters. What they should have done was deal with the TAC setup a few episodes before the last one, and have the last episode focus on Janet's wedding, with return appearances by former cast members, and on the roommates moving out of the apartment.

Yeah, I agree that they should have brought back The Ropers and Cindy too, even though Cindy wasn't apart of the show for that long, she still was one of their friends and should have been in the last episode.

http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/lookaround.gifThe final episode was okay, but I wished they would have had Chrissy, the Ropers, and Cindy invited to Janet's wedding. Chrissy and Janet were best friends for a long time, Cindy was another friend of theirs, and the Ropers were the kids' first landlords. That would have made a good final episode with a reunion. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/eek2.gif