Both of of these are similar episodes. The kids obtain a cute little animal and they end up giving it to the landlord. The No Children, No Pets episode, it's a puppy. In Look What I Found, it's a kitten.
Which do you all like better?
I like them both alot. But No Children, No Pets is funnier. And it's got some funny Roper moments!

------------------
When you gotta gun
in your hand, your
free to make any speech
you want!!-Archie Bunker

STANLEY: The car was overheated,
Helen!
HELEN: So was I!!

MARGE: Kids can be so
creul!
BART: We can? Thanks, Mom!
(Bart socks Lisa)
LISA: Oww!!

HELEN: Stanley, you got
2 choices. You either
put your pants on and take
me to that resturant...
Or leave them off and we
could stay here and
have fun!

KIMBERLY: We've gotta
do something about that
bathroom.
WILLIS: Like what?
KIMBERLY: Like not leaving
the seat up.
WILLIS: That's Arnold.
ARNOLD: No way, I stand
on the seat!

I liked No Children, No Pets way better.

------------------
Andrew Carden

Me too!

http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/biggrin.gif Me three! No Children No Pets were hella lot better! It was funny because Roper didn't allow pets and the kids tried hard to hide the puppy and keep Chrissy from sleepwalking at the same time. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/cool.gif Roper was the typical landlord who didn't allow animals in the building. Last night's episode about the kitten was good, but the one with the puppy was better.

I LIKE LOOK WHAT I FOUND 100 TIMES BETTER.

------------------
B.TELL IT TO THE FROG.
GO ON TELL IT TO HIS FACE. YOU CAN'T CAN YOU? YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE A FACE.