stella
07-27-2004, 03:26 AM
Was it ever explained how the Ropers came about to becoming the apartment building owners and landlords in the first place? The Ropers are not portrayed as very wealthy people so I really wonder how they managed to buy or build the apartment building. We also know that Mr. Roper is dirt cheap, so an apartment building doesn't appear to be like something that he would buy.
In the case of Mr. Furley, it's easy to explain because the real owner was his brother Bart who is portrayed as a wealthy businessman. In his own admission in the episode where Jack failed his cooking exam, Mr. Furley stated that he has never achieved anything in life and has never been successful.
Other than the fact that he was married, I don't sense any major difference between Roper and Furley. So I wonder if perhaps the apartment building was a result of some kind of inheritance.
In the case of Mr. Furley, it's easy to explain because the real owner was his brother Bart who is portrayed as a wealthy businessman. In his own admission in the episode where Jack failed his cooking exam, Mr. Furley stated that he has never achieved anything in life and has never been successful.
Other than the fact that he was married, I don't sense any major difference between Roper and Furley. So I wonder if perhaps the apartment building was a result of some kind of inheritance.