Kazza
07-20-2004, 11:12 AM
The fad of 1948 7inch, 13channels
http://www.tvhistory.tv/1948-Hallicrafters-T54-7in-Metal.JPG
http://www.tvhistory.tv/1948-Hallicrafters-T54-7in-Metal.JPG
|
View Full Version : Can you imagine watching tv in this set?? Kazza 07-20-2004, 11:12 AM The fad of 1948 7inch, 13channels http://www.tvhistory.tv/1948-Hallicrafters-T54-7in-Metal.JPG Lucylover22 07-20-2004, 11:15 AM :eek: Whoa! I couldn't imagine watching tv on a set that small! Brent88 07-20-2004, 11:35 AM :eek2: No. Rhiannon 07-20-2004, 12:09 PM that'd suck PZelda 07-20-2004, 12:10 PM :eek: Oh my... I am Him 07-20-2004, 12:23 PM Its no smaller than the movie files people download on their computers. G-Force Glockstar 07-20-2004, 12:35 PM That would suck! And I would hate it! :o Mrs. Ducky 07-20-2004, 01:02 PM TV is TV no matter what size it is. Kazza 07-20-2004, 02:09 PM Originally posted by Mrs. Ducky TV is TV no matter what size it is. Even if the image was similar to this? http://www.tvhistory.tv/30line.jpg *Bela Lugosi* 07-20-2004, 02:34 PM My TV is 27 inches across Cable ready It has a CD player DVD player VCR and Stereo sound w/ Audio jacks for headphones. (and Color, of course!) I could never live with that little hunk-a-junk! dawsongirl 07-20-2004, 05:51 PM Originally posted by I am Him Its no smaller than the movie files people download on their computers. That is very true. AKA 07-20-2004, 05:56 PM Originally posted by *Bela Lugosi* My TV is 27 inches across Cable ready It has a CD player DVD player VCR and Stereo sound w/ Audio jacks for headphones. (and Color, of course!) I could never live with that little hunk-a-junk! I bet that "little hunk-a-junk" is worth a lot of money. Hollow 07-20-2004, 06:16 PM i used to have like a 4" black and white TV with 4 channels. Lodee 07-20-2004, 08:55 PM It wouldn't have been that bad back then because there wasn't anything better. Fifty years from now they'll probably laugh at what we have and think it sucks. TheGreatPretender 07-20-2004, 09:01 PM how would you be able to see the show? :eek: Mrs. Ducky 07-20-2004, 09:09 PM Originally posted by Unmarried*happy Even if the image was similar to this? http://www.tvhistory.tv/30line.jpg Yep. *Bela Lugosi* 07-20-2004, 11:04 PM Originally posted by AKA I bet that "little hunk-a-junk" is worth a lot of money. Not if it don't work. dawsongirl 07-21-2004, 12:23 AM Originally posted by *Bela Lugosi* Not if it don't work. Even if it doesn't work, it's still worth a ton just for it's age and the fact that it's not in a million pieces or in ill repair (ie missing pieces, damage). crystals 07-21-2004, 12:47 AM Originally posted by Unmarried*happy The fad of 1948 7inch, 13channels http://www.tvhistory.tv/1948-Hallicrafters-T54-7in-Metal.JPG I don't think I've ever seen a tv that small. I don't think I would ever want a tv that small. I'm too used to the 21st century. I have a 27 inch tv and just can't imagine ever watching tv on a set that was only 7 inches. I'd probably be squinting my eyes to see the picture on the screen. Janice 07-21-2004, 02:18 AM I'm so used to my 60" big screen with surround sound, that anything smaller irks me. *Bela Lugosi* 07-21-2004, 11:05 AM Originally posted by Janice I'm so used to my 60" big screen with surround sound, that anything smaller irks me. Damn Janice! That's like a movie theatre in your house! EmoJoe 07-21-2004, 11:48 AM :eek: :eek: No I cant! spunkygirl 07-21-2004, 09:00 PM :eek: OMG NO!!!! That would make my eyes hurt. I don't know how my grandparents ever watched tv on something like that. :eek: |