View Full Version : Was there anything wrong with James wanting to have a GUN in the house to protect his


TVFactFan
06-02-2004, 01:18 AM
Family? I saw nothing wrong with it. I mean if he was going to be the only one touching it, what was the problem? If there was a home intruder then James had to do everything he could to protect his family. The only thing James did wrong was not getting a permit to own the gun.

Caffeine King
06-02-2004, 03:19 AM
Florida was just worried that there would be an accident and one of them would get hurt but I can see why James bought it.

marvin g
06-02-2004, 08:45 PM
Michael didn't help James' case by firing it off.

TVFactFan
06-02-2004, 08:50 PM
Originally posted by marvin g
Michael didn't help James' case by firing it off.


Really, James should have just kept it to hisself that he had a gun. If he didn't want them to touch it they shouldn't have been told about it.

GeeBee
06-04-2004, 08:02 AM
James was not the type who should have a gun. He was too ill-tempered and irrational. Even Michael understood that.

TVFactFan
06-04-2004, 04:21 PM
Originally posted by GeeBee
James was not the type who should have a gun. He was too ill-tempered and irrational. Even Michael understood that.


For some reason the James character was very angry in season 3.

nerrad
06-07-2004, 09:08 AM
he was angry over JJ goofiness.

TVFactFan
06-07-2004, 05:43 PM
Originally posted by nerrad
he was angry over JJ goofiness.


Yeah that is true since he absent in 4 eps in the 3rd season but i was talking about the character James Evans not the actor John Amos