View Full Version : Howard Stern Is off The Air- Shock Jock's Radio Career May Soon Be Finished


Jenya
04-08-2004, 06:40 PM
Howard Stern Is off The Air
Clear Channel Drops Stern on FCC Threat, Shock Jock's Radio Career May Soon Be Finished

ASSOCIATED PRESS (http://www.ap.org/)

Thursday April 08, 2004

WASHINGTON - Federal regulators Thursday proposed $495,000 in indecency fines against Clear Channel Communications for broadcasts by Howard Stern, prompting the nation's largest radio chain to drop the country's best-known shock jock.

Clear Channel suspended Stern in February from its six stations that carry his program, which regularly features graphic sexual discussion and humor. It decided to make the move permanent after the Federal Communications Commission cited the chain for 18 alleged violations from Stern's April 9, 2003, show.

"Mr. Stern's show has created a great liability for us and other broadcasters who air it," said John Hogan, president of Clear Channel Radio. "The Congress and the FCC are even beginning to look at revoking station licenses. That's a risk we're just not willing to take."

In a statement posted on his Web site, Stern said he was not surprised by the fine. He characterized it as furtherance of a "witch hunt" against him by the Bush administration.

"It is pretty shocking that governmental interference into our rights and free speech takes place in the U.S.," he said. "It's hard to reconcile this with the 'land of the free' and the 'home of the brave.'"

The FCC investigation was prompted by a listener in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., who complained about a Stern program that included discussion of sex accompanied by flatulence sounds.

Federal law bars radio stations and over-the-air television channels from airing references to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be tuning in. The rules do not apply to cable and satellite channels or satellite radio.

The FCC imposed the maximum fine of $27,500 for each of 18 violations on six Clear Channel stations: WBGG in Fort Lauderdale; WTKS-FM in Cocoa Beach, Fla.; WTFX-FM in Louisville, Ky.; KIOZ in San Diego; WNVE in Honeoye Falls, N.Y.; and WSDS-FM in Pittsburgh.

The FCC fined each station for two specific incidents during a single program, the first time the commission has done so. Previously, the FCC levied fines for an entire program, no matter how many different indecent utterances occurred.

Commissioner Michael Copps, who usually dissents from indecency decisions because he says the penalties aren't strong enough, was part of a unanimous commission this time.

"I have long advocated that the commission use all of the tools it has to tackle indecency on the public airwaves," he said. "Today's decision is a step forward towards imposing meaningful fines."

Last month, the FCC proposed fining Stern's employer, Infinity Broadcasting, $27,500 for a Stern show broadcast July 26, 2001, on WKRK-FM in Detroit. The show featured discussions about sexual practices and techniques.

Infinity paid $1.7 million in 1995 to settle various violations by Stern. The Center for Public Integrity, a watchdog group, said fines against Stern accounted for almost half of the $4 million in penalties proposed by the FCC since 1990.

Stern has charged on the air that he's being punished for his criticism of President Bush. Clear Channel's political action committee and its employees have given $265,800 to Republicans for the 2004 election, more than any other broadcaster, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group.

"You've got to vote Bush out to send a message as a Howard Stern fan," Stern said during one recent broadcast. "There's a cultural war going on. The religious right is winning. We're losing."

A conservative advocacy group, the Parents Television Council, applauded the FCC's decision.

"Stern is a repeat offender of the most commonsense decency standards and we welcome the news that the FCC is moving to combat these patently indecent shows," said L. Brent Bozell III, the group's president.

Brian
04-08-2004, 06:45 PM
For Stern fans this is bad. I never listened to him much but I thought his show was funny when I listened to it. I think his show was dropped here in San Diego a couple of months ago. But if his radio career is finished, there's always a career in TV but who knows.

Mr. Television
04-08-2004, 06:53 PM
I won't miss him.

Jenya
04-08-2004, 08:00 PM
Originally posted by Brian
For Stern fans this is bad. I never listened to him much but I thought his show was funny when I listened to it. I think his show was dropped here in San Diego a couple of months ago. But if his radio career is finished, there's always a career in TV but who knows.

Infinity Broadcasting will still air the show for now. He is currently broadcasting on 35 radio stations with them. But that may change soon as well. We'll see how long he'll last.

AKA
04-08-2004, 08:07 PM
Statement from Howard:

This is not a surprise. This is a follow up to the McCarthy type "witch hunt" of the administration and the activities of this group of presidential appointees in the FCC, led by "Colin Powell Jr." and his band of players. They and others (a senator from Kansas City to a congresswoman from New Mexico) are expressing and imposing their opinions and rights to tell us all who and what we may listen to and watch and how we should think about our lives. So this is not a surprise. It is pretty shocking that governmental interference into our rights and free speech takes place in the U.S. It's hard to reconcile this with the "land of the free" and the "home of the brave". I'm sure what's next is the removal of "dirty pictures" like the 20th century German exhibit in a New York City Museum and the erotic literature in our libraries; they too will fall into their category of "evil" as well. --Howard Stern, April 8th 2004

Brian Damage
04-08-2004, 08:20 PM
Howard isn't going anywhere. Clear Channel is Infinity's rival. Infinity is the company that I along with Howard are employed by.

FamilyTiesGOP
04-08-2004, 08:20 PM
Stern got what was coming to him. It is not like he has never been controversial before. ClearChannel cannot be fined all the time just so he can have his vulgar freedom of speech. A line has got to be drawn somewhere. Stern was vulgar and controversial before this thing with Janet Jackson ever got started. Go ClearChannel.:thumbsup:

Now if Infinity will step up, it will be great.

MandieR1980
04-08-2004, 08:22 PM
Don't let the door hit you on your a$$ on the way out!

spunkygirl
04-08-2004, 08:31 PM
Long overdue! Yes he was vulgar long before Janet pulled her little stunt, but he can think her for the FCC cracking down!

:) I love it! :lol: Finally someone grew a brain, and is getting rid of the radio trash :D

spunkygirl
04-08-2004, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by MandieR1980
Don't let the door hit you on your a$$ on the way out!

:lol:

Jenya
04-08-2004, 08:39 PM
Originally posted by Topanga
Long overdue! Yes he was vulgar long before Janet pulled her little stunt, but he can think her for the FCC cracking down!

:) I love it! :lol: Finally someone grew a brain, and is getting rid of the radio trash :D

There is a radio station here in Montréal that airs that "Gangsta Rap" after 10:00PM on Fridays and Saturdays. All of that music is unedited. Every filthy vulgar word can be clearly heard on this station. Several people complained about their format, but according to the CRTC, I guess they are allowed to air it after a certain time. I forget the name of the radio station. I don't listen to Hip-Hop or Rap.

MonarC
04-08-2004, 09:31 PM
It's about time!!!!

ClassicComedyFan2
04-08-2004, 10:18 PM
Howard Stern is a crude punk. And, his show is useless. It's about time he got canned!

theshark8777
04-08-2004, 11:12 PM
I don't really care for Howard Stern's radio program, but I am against censorship which is what this is really all about now. Howard Stern has been on the air for what 20 years now? All of the sudden he's obscene, I don't think he's changed in the last 20 years. Why now decide he's too crude for radio or whatever. Michael Powell must go.

AKA
04-08-2004, 11:26 PM
Just reiterating what Brian and Jenya both have said in this thread, because some of you still seem to think he's been fired and/or his show's been cancelled. Howard's show is still on the air. It's just been dropped by ClearChannel Communications stations, which, as far as I recall, is six markets.

ABlairican Pie
04-09-2004, 12:45 AM
To all the Howard-haters out there, just remember:

Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.


Tune in tomorrow: FCC targets talk show queen for indecency. On the next Oprah.

AKA
04-09-2004, 01:15 AM
Yep. Click here (http://www.howardstern.com/-%20Oprah%20Oral%20Anal.htm).

Austin Tripper
04-09-2004, 02:22 AM
I totally agree... I wish people would understand in the usa..WE are supposed to fight for speech we dont like.

because eventually they will ban enough stuff to finally get to something you like!!!:mad:

I can't believe Bush is taking a risk like this in a election year??? why not wait until your re-elected..then spring all this on us.:(

TJL
04-09-2004, 04:07 AM
I have been a Howard Stern Fan for twenty years.

He's been doing the same adolescent stuff for as long as I can remember, yet for some reason, now it's considered "indecent."

If you don't like what he has to say, change the channel.

My parents kept me from listening to Howard Stern until I reached an age when I could decide whether or not I wanted to listen to him. Then it was my own choice.

The rest of the country should take suit.

FamilyTiesGOP
04-09-2004, 01:19 PM
Originally posted by Austin Tripper

I can't believe Bush is taking a risk like this in a election year??? why not wait until your re-elected..then spring all this on us.:(

Just how is Bush responsible for this? It is the head people over at the FCC. Besides, even if he were involved, it wouldn't be a risk because I would say the vast majority of Americans agree that Howard Stern being off the air is a good thing. All of this can be traced back to the episode with Janet Jackson, not any desire of President Bush. He could have done this a long time ago.

SBTB Geek
04-09-2004, 01:24 PM
Why are some people here celebrating the fact that the FCC is coming down on Howard?!... Don't you guys know that this is the beginning of a very big movement (not at our advantage)... at this time they are just using Howard as an example.

The FCC already said that they are looking into a specific Oprah episode, and some soap operas. Sooner or later we will only have pro-Bush and religious programming on TV and radio.

MandieR1980
04-09-2004, 01:26 PM
Originally posted by SBTB Geek
Why are some people here celebrating the fact that the FCC is coming down on Howard?!... Don't you guys know that this is the beginning of a very big movement (not at our advantage)... at this time they are just using Howard as an example.

The FCC already said that they are looking into a specific Oprah episode, and some soap operas. Sooner or later we will only have pro-Bush and religious programming on TV and radio.

because I hate Howard and I wouldn't save his life if he was choking.

SBTB Geek
04-09-2004, 01:32 PM
Originally posted by MandieR1980
because I hate Howard and I wouldn't save his life if he was choking.

This isn't about Howard Stern, it's about our rights.

MandieR1980
04-09-2004, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by SBTB Geek
This isn't about Howard Stern, it's about our rights.

well to me it's about Howard

SBTB Geek
04-09-2004, 01:35 PM
Originally posted by MandieR1980
well to me it's about Howard

It isn't.

Mr. Television
04-09-2004, 03:06 PM
Well look another thread thats turned into a political debate. I don't care about Howard Stern. If he wants to go on HBO or some pay cable channel thats fine. The FCC has been laxed for many years on what goes over the airways. And I don't think his show has any value whats so ever. I like watching some more adult shows like NYPD Blue and The Shield but at least I see some quality with them.

FamilyTiesGOP
04-09-2004, 05:36 PM
The government or the FCC didn't ban Howard from the airwaves. A company called Clear Channel did because they obviously didn't want to put up with his behavior, the fines he generated, or both. The FCC just ensures that appropriate programming airs at appropriate times. I don't feel like my rights are being threatened at all. All Howard has to do is not go so outrageous with his show and he won't get fined and other stations won't cancel him.

AKA
04-09-2004, 05:39 PM
Whether or not you like Stern, he has every right to broadcast, as he has done for the last thirty years.

sinatrastar
04-09-2004, 05:53 PM
If Clear Channel is getting fined for having his 4/9/03 show on 6 stations, why isnt Infinity getting fined for having it on many more stations?

Anyway it sounds like he violated a law, so his beef should be with getting the law changed/thrown out rather than arguing with the FCC over enforcing it.

FamilyTiesGOP
04-09-2004, 06:27 PM
Originally posted by sinatrastar
If Clear Channel is getting fined for having his 4/9/03 show on 6 stations, why isnt Infinity getting fined for having it on many more stations?

Anyway it sounds like he violated a law, so his beef should be with getting the law changed/thrown out rather than arguing with the FCC over enforcing it.

I'm not sure about the 4/9/03 show, but I believe that Infinity has been fined before because of Stern. Clear Channel has just decided not to put up with it anymore.

Brian Damage
04-09-2004, 09:45 PM
Originally posted by mr roper
Well look another thread thats turned into a political debate. I don't care about Howard Stern. If he wants to go on HBO or some pay cable channel thats fine. The FCC has been laxed for many years on what goes over the airways. And I don't think his show has any value whats so ever. I like watching some more adult shows like NYPD Blue and The Shield but at least I see some quality with them.

What if the FCC or some other group complained about those shows content and got those said shows cancelled? How would you feel about that?

Jrnygrl
04-10-2004, 02:20 AM
Originally posted by Brian Damage
What if the FCC or some other group complained about those shows content and got those said shows cancelled? How would you feel about that?

I agree with your statement.

:wave:

Mr. Television
04-10-2004, 02:51 PM
Originally posted by Brian Damage
What if the FCC or some other group complained about those shows content and got those said shows cancelled? How would you feel about that?
When NYPD Blue premiered their was a channel on my cable system that refused to air it. They later did after the show became a hit. Their was also a local radio station in NC where I lived at the time in the late 1980's that was forced to drop the Morton Downey Jr. Radio Show when the public outcry was so great. It was dropped after about 2 or 3 days. I don't generally believe in censorship but you have to follow the FCC Guidelines. In the end it will be the public that determines if Howard Stern remains on the air or not.