PDA

View Full Version : Lindsay Lohan Poses Nude As Marilyn Monroe


Brian Damage
02-18-2008, 11:31 PM
In what is likely her greatest role to date, Lindsay Lohan plays Marilyn Monroe between the sheets – literally – in the new spring fashion issue of New York magazine.

Recreating Monroe's legendary 1962 final photo shoot for Bert Stern with the veteran lensman himself, Lohan posed for the spread on Feb. 5 at the Hotel Bel-Air.

When it came to being nude before the camera, "I was comfortable with it," says Lohan, 21 (Monroe was 36 in 1962, the year she died) – though Lindsay does admit to having done "250 crunches" the night before the shoot.

There was also no avoiding the parallels between Monroe's tragic fate – dead from an accidental overdose of prescription medicines – and that, recently, of Heath Ledger's.

"They are both prime examples of what this industry can do to someone," says Lohan.

When it is pointed out to Lohan, who has been in rehab three times, that the possibility may exist of a similar fate for her, the young actress replies with a tinge of annoyance: "I don't know. I'm not them. But I sure as hell wouldn't let it happen to me."

http://nymag.com/

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 12:24 AM
Sorry, doesn't work. Marilyn didn't have a tattoo on her booty.

Her comment in the last paragraph is VERY NAIVE AND VERY STUPID for her to say. She needs more help if she thinks that an early death can't happen to her.

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 12:27 AM
Sorry, doesn't work. Marilyn didn't have a tattoo on her booty.


I saw the pics and they were done real classy. I really hope she turns her life around.

PS,

They are REAL! :lol:

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 12:31 AM
:lol: I had no doubt they are REAL. :lol:

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 12:34 AM
Seriously though, it seems she has turned a corner for the positive.

Mikado
02-19-2008, 12:36 AM
Not nearly as sexy as Id have thought.....She looked better as a brunette

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 12:38 AM
Not nearly as sexy as Id have thought.....She looked better as a brunette

Brieannas21
02-19-2008, 12:38 AM
Yeah they look real, but she's FAR from Marilyn. That wig was all wrong, someone should sue that wig maker

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 12:39 AM
My hopes for all the people with addictions is they get the help they need. Just comments like hers in that last paragraph kinda scares me. :eek: Let's hope and think positive.

The one photo where you see her bosom, her face or rather, the shadows on her face make her face look weird...then again, I am sure you weren't paying attention to her face. :lol: ;) The wig looks awful too.

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 12:50 AM
My hopes for all the people with addictions is they get the help they need. Just comments like hers in that last paragraph kinda scares me. :eek: Let's hope and think positive.

The one photo where you see her bosom, her face or rather, the shadows on her face make her face look weird...then again, I am sure you weren't paying attention to her face. :lol: ;) The wig looks awful too.


I was shocked when I saw the photos. Usually when they say nude, you think like the photo above. I really didn't think she would be Playboy nude. lol

Brieannas21
02-19-2008, 12:51 AM
My hopes for all the people with addictions is they get the help they need. Just comments like hers in that last paragraph kinda scares me. :eek: Let's hope and think positive.

The one photo where you see her bosom, her face or rather, the shadows on her face make her face look weird...then again, I am sure you weren't paying attention to her face. :lol: ;) The wig looks awful too.


Bosom :lol: I haven't heard that word in a long time....Bosom :lol:

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 12:52 AM
I was shocked when I saw the photos. Usually when they say nude, you think like the photo above. I really didn't think she would be Playboy nude. lol
:lol: Your eyes must have gotten HUGE!!!!!;)




Brie, I posted bosom because what I wanted to post, I can't. ;) :lol:

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 12:54 AM
:lol: Your eyes must have gotten HUGE!!!!!;)




Brie, I posted bosom because what I wanted to post, I can't. ;) :lol:


I was completely shocked..let's just say that. :lol:

Skywalker
02-19-2008, 12:56 AM
They mentioned this earlier tonight on one of the tabloid shows and I thought it was some kind of joke. After all, it's not everyday when a star as big as Lohan poses naked in a magazine. :lol: So I go to a site and see the pics and they blew me away. She's no Marilyn, but then again, who is? Lindsay looks amazing in those pics. :faint:

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 12:59 AM
I was completely shocked..let's just say that. :lol:
Yeah, I admit, I was too. It seems nowadays some of the magazines will show Playboy style pics. I remember back in the 90's Madonna did a few pics in some fashion magazine (I still have it) where she was nude and also had breast shots. One page was practically BOOBS! Mind you, I know it is Madonna we are talking abt, but the fact these pics were in a fashion magazine blew me away. I was not prepared for those kind of pics. :eek:

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 01:01 AM
Yeah, I admit, I was too. It seems nowadays some of the magazines will show Playboy style pics. I remember back in the 90's Madonna did a few pics in some fashion magazine (I still have it) where she was nude and also had breast shots. One page was practically BOOBS! Mind you, I know it is Madonna we are talking abt, but the fact these pics were in a fashion magazine blew me away. I was not prepared for those kind of pics. :eek:


Exactly!

I was expecting to see a slight butt crack, not the full monty!

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 01:02 AM
Exactly!

I was expecting to see a slight butt crack, not the full monty!
HELLO!!!!!!!


:brent :rofl:

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 01:04 AM
They mentioned this earlier tonight on one of the tabloid shows and I thought it was some kind of joke. After all, it's not everyday when a star as big as Lohan poses naked in a magazine. :lol: So I go to a site and see the pics and they blew me away. She's no Marilyn, but then again, who is? Lindsay looks amazing in those pics. :faint:



Yeah, I saw the same thing...I think it was Extra. Anyhoo, what a shock!

HuntingtonM15
02-19-2008, 01:05 AM
I personally think that photo looks horrible. It seems like they would have went with someone who is a bit more...fuller. Anyway, I am really rooting for Lindsay to turn her life around. She has too much talent (in acting) to go to waste.

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 01:08 AM
I hear that. Lindsay has such a great road ahead of her and she has the talent. She is not the first actress to have problems. She has acting talent and it would be nice to see her taken seriously and get some dramatic roles where she can prove herself again.

Skywalker
02-19-2008, 01:24 AM
Yeah, I saw the same thing...I think it was Extra. Anyhoo, what a shock!

Do they have those kinds of pictures in New York Magazine every month? If that's the case, I may have to start subscribing to it. :lol:

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 08:39 AM
Do they have those kinds of pictures in New York Magazine every month? If that's the case, I may have to start subscribing to it. :lol:


:lol: I have no idea, but I'll certainly keep an eye out now. :lol:

MonarC
02-19-2008, 03:27 PM
If you spent yesterday celebrating the presidents of this great country away from the Internet, you may have missed Lindsay Lohan's freckles and bare breasts. Don't worry, you can still ogle them here.

http://media.nymag.com/fashion/08/lindsay-as-marilyn/ :eek:
WARNING: IMAGES NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR SCHOOL

New York magazine managed to get LiLo in a state of undress usually reserved for more intimate moments by using those three little words that make any starlet strip down: Marilyn Monroe re-creation.

Donning a voluminous wig, winged eyeliner and, uh, not much else, La Lohan revisited the famed "Last Sitting" photo shoot with the very same photographer that captured the intimate moments of the screen legend just six weeks before she was found dead.

Never mind the eerie parallels that can be drawn between the two voluptuous actresses or that we can't figure out why Lindsay is on the cover of every magazine right now promoting absolutely nothing. The real issue here is real or fake, of course! (And you know what we're talking about.)

But maybe you just want to enjoy the pics, and please, do so. We're guessing whatever magazine spread we may find Lindsay in next week will feature more clothes.

SBTB Geek
02-19-2008, 03:33 PM
She looks good in the majority of the pics... but some of them are very unflattering.

http://g.photos.cx/03-81.jpg...
she looks almost 40 in that one.

InspectorExstead
02-19-2008, 04:25 PM
yeah...that wig looks really bad/fake on her in the first picture. lol.
but i agree with you SBTB Geek...she definitely looks older in these pictures in an unflattering way. maybe all of that alcohol consumption is finally getting to her. lol.

MonarC
02-19-2008, 06:09 PM
She has been partying too hard. she needs more sleep and water. Less alcohol and parties. I think she looks hot.

dawsongirl
02-19-2008, 08:11 PM
Yeah...those pics were pretty bad. She's not nude model material.

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 08:36 PM
:lol: I have no idea, but I'll certainly keep an eye out now. :lol:
:lol: :lol:

AKA
02-19-2008, 08:38 PM
You know, there are so many people who have had live-devastating addictions to pornography, and the mainstream media parading this story and rubbing it in their faces doesn't help them.

It turns into a case of porn looking people up, not people looking up porn.

MonarC
02-19-2008, 09:15 PM
Since when is taking a classy nude pic porn?

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 09:17 PM
Since when is taking a classy nude pic porn?


I agree, I don't consider this porn.

Courtnee
02-19-2008, 09:21 PM
She looks good in the majority of the pics... but some of them are very unflattering.

http://g.photos.cx/03-81.jpg...
she looks almost 40 in that one.
Most of the pictures are beautiful, but I agree, that one isn't the cream of the crop.

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 09:22 PM
That is one awful pic. It is unflattering for sure. You have to almost squint to see her lips.

Courtnee
02-19-2008, 09:26 PM
That is one awful pic. It is unflattering for sure. You have to almost squint to see her lips.
The lighting is very harsh, making those normally cute freckles look almost sickly, and that face just isn't sexy at all.

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 09:33 PM
The lighting is very harsh, making those normally cute freckles look almost sickly, and that face just isn't sexy at all.
For sure. I mean freckles can be attractive and sexy, but you are right, the lighting makes them look unflattering indeed. Her facial expression in that pic could have been better.

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 09:36 PM
I think you gotta blame the photographer for that. It's their job to bring out the best in their subjects.

Courtnee
02-19-2008, 09:47 PM
I think you gotta blame the photographer for that. It's their job to bring out the best in their subjects.
Exactly, however, recreating something like the Marilyn Playboy shoot is extremely difficult, so the fact that he got that is remarkable.
Part of it, however, is Lohans perception of sexy which isn't what would be considered sexy back in Marilyns day. She was probably going for the "turned on" look, but maybe she was a little nervous and it showed up in the picture.

Also, Lindsay's skin is fairer than Marilyn was, so the light should have been fine tuned to flatter in this case, not to be an exact copy. It would have been nice to see a different variation instead of an cookie cutter copy of the pervious shoot.

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 09:52 PM
I think you gotta blame the photographer for that. It's their job to bring out the best in their subjects.
Most definitely. Which makes it interesting to wonder if these were the "best" pics, I can imagine how the worst ones look like? :eek: Some of the others look great, but as Courtnee and I agreed on, that one pic in particular is not very flattering. As a professional photographer, you would expect better, and considering it is New York Magazine, it should be the best.

Then again, maybe that is the look he wanted. Raw and imperfected. Each photographer has his/her own style and look.

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 10:26 PM
Exactly, however, recreating something like the Marilyn Playboy shoot is extremely difficult, so the fact that he got that is remarkable.
Part of it, however, is Lohans perception of sexy which isn't what would be considered sexy back in Marilyns day. She was probably going for the "turned on" look, but maybe she was a little nervous and it showed up in the picture.

Also, Lindsay's skin is fairer than Marilyn was, so the light should have been fine tuned to flatter in this case, not to be an exact copy. It would have been nice to see a different variation instead of an cookie cutter copy of the pervious shoot.


Very well said!

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 10:28 PM
Most definitely. Which makes it interesting to wonder if these were the "best" pics, I can imagine how the worst ones look like? :eek: Some of the others look great, but as Courtnee and I agreed on, that one pic in particular is not very flattering. As a professional photographer, you would expect better, and considering it is New York Magazine, it should be the best.

Then again, maybe that is the look he wanted. Raw and imperfected. Each photographer has his/her own style and look.


Very true Irene, perhaps imperfection is what this photographer was seeking. Why else would he not airbrush the freckles?

Ireneparalegal
02-19-2008, 10:31 PM
Very true Irene, perhaps imperfection is what this photographer was seeking. Why else would he not airbrush the freckles?
True. It would be wrong for him to do that though, that would be telling Lindsay and those with freckles that they aren't cute or sexy. I will say that colored pic with her holding up that sheer cloth is absolutely beautiful. Now that is a nice picture. :thumbsup: I prefer how the colored pics of her look over the black and white shots.

Brian Damage
02-19-2008, 11:23 PM
Lindsay Lohan's nude pictorial in the current issue of New York magazine has received the stamp of approval from her manager-mom Dina.

"It was very tastefully done," Dina tells PEOPLE of the photos, a recreation of Marilyn Monroe's legendary 1962 photo shoot shot by Bert Stern. "I respect the photographer as an artist, so I look at them artistically. For him to call Lindsay 46 years later and to say can you recreate these photos is an honor. I looked at it as art, and as Lindsay doing a character. So I don't look at them like it's Playboy; she was being a character. So if you look at it that way, you can look at it as a mother."

And Dina adds that had the photos been inappropriate, Lindsay's sister Ali would not have visited the set. "Trust me," Dina tells PEOPLE, "I wouldn't have sent my 14-year-old to the set [if the shoot was in bad taste]. And obviously Lindsay wouldn't do anything with her sister there, that was risquι."

Lindsay, 21, also viewed the shoot as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, Dina tells PEOPLE.

"Lindsay was very excited when she first got the phone call," says Dina, 45. "Of course we talked about how they would be done. Lindsay said, 'Mommy, I'm never going to get this opportunity to do it again.' She was very thankful she was asked."

And being a Monroe fan, only made Lohan even more determined to do the shoot.

"She's always loved Marilyn," Dina says. "For Christmas, my girlfriends even gave her a Marilyn cookie jar. I think there's a sadness that Lindsay feels for Marilyn. Lindsay really saw it as a gift back to someone."

But Lindsay made sure she was in tip-top shape for the shoot. "Lindsay did 250 crunches before because she was nervous since she had never done anything like that before," Dina says.

As for Lindsay's other projects, Dina says Lindsay is busy recording her third album. "I've heard a couple of tracks," Dina says. "They were amazing!"

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20178833,00.html

Courtnee
02-20-2008, 10:02 PM
I think in order to recreate these shots of Marilyn, the model would have to go through the heartbreak that she suffered through for practically her whole life to fully sell the shot.

*ClassicPinUp*
02-21-2008, 10:20 AM
There was also no avoiding the parallels between Monroe's tragic fate – dead from an accidental overdose of prescription medicines – and that, recently, of Heath Ledger's.
Marilyn Monroe was murdered. Heath died of an overdose. There are no parallels.



As for the pictures. I think it's a shame. I'm thinking this guy just wants his name in the paper's again so what better way to do that then to "recreate" Marilyn's last shoot. I don't like it. I have nothing against Lindsay but if he wanted to recreate Monroe's shoot what an awful choice! Physically her face/body/skin couldn't look more different and there's little to nothing about her life that mimicks Marilyn's. And I'm sorry (I know everyone seems to think the pictures were beautiful) but the pictures look horrible! I'm not sure how Bert think's they're anything alike... I guess he's confused.

With all that said I WILL admit that as a lifelong Marilyn Monroe fan I don't like or see the point of "recreating" anything she did BUT if for some far off reason they do I would expect them to use the best person available and IMO that just isn't Lindsay.

If he truly wanted to recreate that shoot he should of used -Susan Griffiths- She recreated Monroe's last shoot during Elton John's "Candle in the Wind" performance and was stunning! She really has a good resemblance and definitely has Marilyn's mannerisms down pat.
Here's that performance. Sometimes it's hard to tell it's not Marilyn; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqqa7xsFefU

mrs.gingerhinkley
02-24-2008, 02:23 PM
no one can be Marilyn; especially Lindsay Lohan!

Ireneparalegal
02-24-2008, 02:47 PM
no one can be Marilyn; especially Lindsay Lohan!
I just realized yesterday that Lindsay also did pictorials of Elizabeth Taylor and Liza Minnelli. Let me take that back, she did covers emulating those two ladies, just like she does here with Marilyn, but I don't know if on the inside of those mags she did more emulating of those two. One of them was INTERVIEW magazine.

mrs.gingerhinkley
02-24-2008, 05:41 PM
I just realized yesterday that Lindsay also did pictorials of Elizabeth Taylor and Liza Minnelli. Let me take that back, she did covers emulating those two ladies, just like she does here with Marilyn, but I don't know if on the inside of those mags she did more emulating of those two. One of them was INTERVIEW magazine.

:barf:
That's really pathetic that she can't make an identity for herself without disgracing the names of such classic stars. I hate it when people think they're something they're not. :mad:

Ireneparalegal
02-24-2008, 05:57 PM
Here is Lindsay as Liza Minnelli, Diane Keaton and Elizabeth Taylor:

*ClassicPinUp*
02-24-2008, 06:29 PM
:barf:
That's really pathetic that she can't make an identity for herself without disgracing the names of such classic stars. I hate it when people think they're something they're not. :mad:
Thank you! You took the words right out of my mouth. It's bad enough Lindsay compares herself to Marilyn Monroe A LOT but now this? Uh, I wish they'd stop feeding her deillusional little fantasy.

Schmoopie
09-06-2008, 06:33 AM
I'm sorry but those pictures are making me physically ill! I used to think Lindsay Lohan was adorable back when she did "Parent Trap". It seemed that she was headed in the right direction (as far as being a "normal" teenager is concerned), but then she hit rock bottom.

She looks nothing like Marilyn Monroe (and I resent the comment about her looking 40 because that's how old I am... well until the 15th that is!:lol: !!!), and I don't think any of them are flattering. Marilyn was much prettier!

And correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard that she was murdered. I read that she was very depressed and so forth.

I'm not trying to start an argument here :smash: :schmack: :boxing: ; really. I just don't believe that she was murdered.

Anyway, about Lindsay. I simply cannot stand her anymore. She has become so unflattering and has fallen to the same league as Brittany and Paris.

Andrea